From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: scan: Consolidate Device Check and Bus Check notification handling
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:41:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240227094131.0000291c@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7632957.EvYhyI6sBW@kreacher>
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:46:41 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> There is no particular reason why device object subtree rescans in
> acpi_scan_device_check() and acpi_scan_device_check() should be carried
> out differently, so move the rescan code into a new function called
> acpi_scan_rescan_bus() and make both the functions above invoke it.
>
> While at it, in the Device Check case, start the device object subtree
> rescan mentioned above from the target device's parent, as per the
> specification. [1]
>
> Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#device-object-notification-values # [1]
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Thanks,
Jonathan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-26 16:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI: scan: Check enabled _STA bit on Bus/Device Checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: scan: Fix device check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ACPI: scan: Relocate acpi_bus_trim_one() Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI: scan: Make acpi_processor_add() check the device enabled bit Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 9:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-27 11:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI: scan: Rework Device Check and Bus Check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 9:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-26 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: scan: Consolidate " Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27 9:41 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240227094131.0000291c@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox