* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/42] 5.10.212-rc1 review
2024-03-04 21:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/42] 5.10.212-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-03-05 9:05 ` Dominique Martinet
2024-03-05 10:23 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dominique Martinet @ 2024-03-05 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:23:27PM +0000:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.212 release.
> There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.212-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested 4b0abedc88b0 ("Linux 5.10.212-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
For some reason the wlan interface didn't come up on the arm32 board
(brcmfmac brought up through usb, mainline driver), which is something I
hadn't observed before, but I've just rebooted a dozen of times and it's
always been up after that *and* I don't see anything in this stable
release that sounds like it could be related so I'll blame it on a
glitch to look further into, and not something related...
(I'll report back again if I find something more convincing, trying to
get a second occurence at least... if I can reproduce I'll confirm it
reproduce on 5.10.211 first then keep digging but it looks like that'll
take a while)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
Thanks,
--
Dominique
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/42] 5.10.212-rc1 review
2024-03-04 21:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/42] 5.10.212-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-03-05 9:05 ` Dominique Martinet
@ 2024-03-05 10:23 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-03-05 10:58 ` Jon Hunter
2024-03-05 11:23 ` Pavel Machek
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-03-05 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 03:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.212 release.
> There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.212-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Following build failures noticed on riscv.
The riscv defconfig, tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds on 5.10.
The riscv tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds on 5.15.
linux.5.10.y build failures on riscv.
riscv:
* gcc-8-defconfig
* clang-17-allnoconfig
* gcc-12-tinyconfig
* gcc-8-allnoconfig
* gcc-8-allmodconfig
* clang-17-defconfig
* gcc-12-defconfig
* clang-17-tinyconfig
* gcc-12-allmodconfig
* gcc-8-tinyconfig
* gcc-12-allnoconfig
linux.5.15.y build failures on riscv.
riscv:
build:
* gcc-12-tinyconfig
* gcc-8-allnoconfig
* clang-17-tinyconfig
* gcc-8-tinyconfig
* gcc-12-allnoconfig
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c:39:9: error: implicit declaration
of function 'arch_stack_walk' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
39 | arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Suspecting patch,
riscv: add CALLER_ADDRx support
commit 680341382da56bd192ebfa4e58eaf4fec2e5bca7 upstream.
steps to reproduce:
---
# tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch riscv --toolchain gcc-12
--kconfig defconfig
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/v5.10.210-166-g4b0abedc88b0/testrun/22941782/suite/test/gcc-12-defconfig/details/
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/v5.10.210-166-g4b0abedc88b0/testrun/22941144/suite/test/gcc-12-defconfig/history/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2dF5ke88GqtfanduGie1JGLUbVa/
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/v5.15.149-332-ge7cbbec10c6e/testrun/22942335/suite/test/gcc-12-allnoconfig/history/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2dF68wn0dXbU2xGLRyzsxGdXTyB/
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/42] 5.10.212-rc1 review
2024-03-04 21:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/42] 5.10.212-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-03-05 9:05 ` Dominique Martinet
2024-03-05 10:23 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-03-05 10:58 ` Jon Hunter
2024-03-05 11:23 ` Pavel Machek
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-03-05 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra,
stable
On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 21:23:27 +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.212 release.
> There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.212-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
68 tests: 68 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.212-rc1-g4b0abedc88b0
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/42] 5.10.212-rc1 review
2024-03-04 21:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/42] 5.10.212-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-03-05 10:58 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-03-05 11:23 ` Pavel Machek
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-03-05 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1180 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.212 release.
> There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
We get build failures on risc-v here:
CC ipc/msgutil.o
1688arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c: In function 'return_address':
1689arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c:39:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_stack_walk' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1690 39 | arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL);
1691 | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1692cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
1693make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:286: arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.o] Error 1
1694make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
1695 CC ipc/msg.o
More here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/1200687731
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread