public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Petr Tesařík" <petr@tesarici.cz>
Cc: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@huawei-partners.com>,
	"kernel-team@android.com" <kernel-team@android.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] swiotlb: Remove pointless stride adjustment for allocations >= PAGE_SIZE
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 15:08:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240305140833.GC3659@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304200428.4111d78e@meshulam.tesarici.cz>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 08:04:28PM +0100, Petr Tesařík wrote:
> Sure, this will solve the allocations. But my understanding of this
> same thread is that we don't need it here. The historical page order
> alignment applies ONLY to allocations, NOT to mappings. It is
> documented in Documentation/core-api/dma-api-howto.rst under Consistent
> DMA mappings, for dma_alloc_coherent(). IIUC it does not apply to the
> streaming DMA mappings. At least, it would explain why nobody
> complained that the more strict guarantee for sizes greater than
> PAGE_SIZE was not kept...

Yes.  arm32 (and before the dma-direct conversion various other
architectures) have relaxed the required to a PAGE_SIZE alignment,
and at least no native dma direct has ever returned less than PAGE_SIZE
alignment even for smaller allocations (as they are all rounded up
to PAGE_SIZE).  So I think the documentation could also use some
updating to match reality.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-05 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-28 13:39 [PATCH v5 0/6] Fix double allocation in swiotlb_alloc() Will Deacon
2024-02-28 13:39 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] swiotlb: Fix double-allocation of slots due to broken alignment handling Will Deacon
2024-02-29  5:44   ` Michael Kelley
2024-02-28 13:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] swiotlb: Enforce page alignment in swiotlb_alloc() Will Deacon
2024-02-28 13:39 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] swiotlb: Honour dma_alloc_coherent() " Will Deacon
2024-02-28 13:39 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] swiotlb: Fix alignment checks when both allocation and DMA masks are present Will Deacon
2024-02-28 13:39 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] iommu/dma: Force swiotlb_max_mapping_size on an untrusted device Will Deacon
2024-02-29  5:57   ` Michael Kelley
2024-02-28 13:39 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] swiotlb: Remove pointless stride adjustment for allocations >= PAGE_SIZE Will Deacon
2024-02-29  6:07   ` Michael Kelley
2024-02-29  7:36     ` Michael Kelley
2024-02-29 13:33       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-29 15:44         ` Michael Kelley
2024-02-29 15:47           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-01 15:39             ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-01 16:38               ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-01 17:33                 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-01 17:08               ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-01 17:54                 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-01 18:42                   ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-04  3:31                     ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-04 11:00                       ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-04 13:37                         ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-04 15:55                           ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-04 16:02                             ` Will Deacon
2024-03-04 16:10                               ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-04 16:53                                 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-04 18:22                                   ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-05 11:20                                     ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-05 15:15                                       ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-04 19:04                                 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-05 14:08                                   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-03-04 16:04                             ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-04 17:11                               ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-04 18:08                                 ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-05 14:05                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-04 15:32     ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240305140833.GC3659@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=petr.tesarik1@huawei-partners.com \
    --cc=petr@tesarici.cz \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox