From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41FF423767; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.153.233 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709904718; cv=none; b=bhrMUJu/DDIhCTseCQgsGM+I5c9SdhlXsE68xbMhUJo+hcZHZGzZ4KP1nNYAEfVqmz7MaOCtwM8PAQ+J0FckKr5gieOhMk1iHyTFEIRv4WGJKqIR2JxDyoVQsDMyXZ7wCPtKkIwviJ6UYVNt/4ykAWROznQoQJAr6bfxIzLjocE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709904718; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VRiN8CKS3sh1wMvDsax50mAoOBJo3MCRXqXUv0ang2U=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ixZG7mva0cnWTUk46ahZf+6Ld2LFfsS7CXCvFUJPrnKSHVnNItWMW2QLC/mC9peFIeQ9KoAXXeifThjh6IIuwRJAGnlpG6tMtcJJxuX/yCItrTV9vmHUfptm1Yr1CSnL+jxvnuAT0R4oMrlctcUL6KH1wEuHLJDqIgkDimYNqq8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b=K+7Kl1jQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.153.233 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="K+7Kl1jQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1709904716; x=1741440716; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=VRiN8CKS3sh1wMvDsax50mAoOBJo3MCRXqXUv0ang2U=; b=K+7Kl1jQBVaco1bkKh5N+d3JtB9ehhpPAd/CbbhKsuhtlA8BN8m4xc78 +x0HJnjzTFC9dDxcIbXcL73QPjqDsTjcPq8KHyMO3kXSBSIY0v0/7dAY7 xzTaoWWGgUsrNg6cyOZSKFhZLk4rAHHDo6DCFRZfZAphBaAHFR6v8GGoy w2/u+pmw6Zpj9C5j49fuiU9rdoKmZqxS36sCRz6GhViKN402FRm9n35Hp UBMpHZN+e8gzQLpxolA9lnv4kirlYUOcApHbeUafGEcXUQPy83xmTHUOE +Wth+4bA6GHZKhc8+p3FiThOddbtz4XrKu+tYaUErvil+TQLWEDBJlaHT A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 14jFhm6gRRWLoLmFhY4w/Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DOI968ShSd6ruVMdhr/kkw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,109,1708412400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="19066625" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa1.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 08 Mar 2024 06:31:53 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 06:31:53 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.85.11) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 06:31:50 -0700 Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:31:05 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.7 000/161] 6.7.9-rc3 review Message-ID: <20240308-upstate-unfixable-fed1854c1bb0@wendy> References: <20240305112824.448003471@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zZw4yvtNimRxhiAJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240305112824.448003471@linuxfoundation.org> --zZw4yvtNimRxhiAJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:28:47AM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.7.9 release. > There are 161 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Clearly I am rather late, but I did get around to testing this one yesterday. Tested-by: Conor Dooley Thanks, Conor. --zZw4yvtNimRxhiAJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZesTGQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0kX4AQCv00O2M6yh5MtQrgDk3ZQuEa0ffaeAI3tB/F6RASqF+wD/aHhZZiGmAaOZ 1QHCx7+UHu/ugZIzv2QL0+jpxwSt+gc= =drbk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zZw4yvtNimRxhiAJ--