From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
keescook@chromium.org,
"open list:HFI1 DRIVER" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] IB/hfi1: allocate dummy net_device dynamically
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:25:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240311112532.71f1cb35@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240311102251.GJ12921@unreal>
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:22:51 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From my experience, you can leverage all the helpers to deal with the
> > relationship between struct net_device and you private structure. Here
> > are some examples that comes to my mind:
> >
> > * alloc_netdev() allocates the private structure for you
> > * netdev_priv() gets the private structure for you
> > * dev->priv_destructor sets the destructure to be called when the
> > interface goes away or failures.
>
> Everything above is true, but it doesn't relevant to HFI1 devices which
> are not netdev devices.
Why are they abusing struct net_device then?
If you're willing to take care of removing the use of NAPI from this
driver completely, that'd be great.
> > > Will it create multiple "dummy" netdev in the system? Will all devices
> > > have the same "dummy" name?
> >
> > Are these devices visible to userspace?
>
> HFI devices yes, dummy device no.
>
> >
> > This allocation are using NET_NAME_UNKNOWN, which implies that the
> > device is not expose to userspace.
>
> Great
>
> >
> > Would you prefer a different name?
>
> I prefer to see some new wrapper over plain alloc_netdev, which will
> create this dummy netdevice. For example, alloc_dummy_netdev(...).
Nope, no bona fide APIs for hacky uses.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 18:29 [PATCH net-next] IB/hfi1: allocate dummy net_device dynamically Breno Leitao
2024-03-10 10:14 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-11 10:08 ` Breno Leitao
2024-03-11 10:22 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-11 18:25 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-03-12 7:52 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-11 12:05 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2024-03-11 12:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-11 15:32 ` Breno Leitao
2024-03-11 22:22 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2024-03-12 7:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-26 8:56 Breno Leitao
2024-04-30 12:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-04-30 14:03 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2024-04-30 14:10 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-04-30 14:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-30 15:53 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240311112532.71f1cb35@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox