From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: cve@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
Subject: Re: CVE-2024-26628: drm/amdkfd: Fix lock dependency warning
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:09:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240314110938.GM1522089@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zerheyn-4rB5kySt@tiehlicka>
On Fri, 08 Mar 2024, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 06-03-24 06:46:11, Greg KH wrote:
> [...]
> > Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > ---- ----
> > lock(&svms->lock);
> > lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
> > lock(&svms->lock);
> > lock((work_completion)(&svm_bo->eviction_work));
> >
> > I believe this cannot really lead to a deadlock in practice, because
> > svm_range_evict_svm_bo_worker only takes the mmap_read_lock if the BO
> > refcount is non-0. That means it's impossible that svm_range_bo_release
> > is running concurrently. However, there is no good way to annotate this.
>
> OK, so is this even a bug (not to mention a security/weakness)?
Looks like the patch fixes a warning which can crash some kernels. So
the CVE appears to be fixing that, rather than the impossible deadlock.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-14 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2024030649-CVE-2024-26628-f6ce@gregkh>
2024-03-08 9:59 ` CVE-2024-26628: drm/amdkfd: Fix lock dependency warning Michal Hocko
2024-03-14 11:09 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2024-03-20 15:32 ` Michal Hocko
2024-03-20 15:47 ` Lee Jones
2024-03-20 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2024-03-20 17:11 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-13 9:32 ` Pavel Machek
2024-06-13 10:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-13 10:40 ` Pavel Machek
2024-06-13 10:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-13 11:44 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240314110938.GM1522089@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=cve@kernel.org \
--cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox