From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 682C0768FB; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 22:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710455030; cv=none; b=IyK7LRWVYr/ygRAf3+lL7mieEAW8+dCiBU2BuoDDOnKRWDbt4+0YtNXwGoayH8ooNu6SyTj7BtkRJLdhnSQzTqrmiEFCJxdQz+nXgJTZjZqEIqXuDI05StczCNeyeeHabRaTwhOIlZYn+uSV5GBss3UQXcW/zkwhxD4NXswfujM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710455030; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1UvIatx4kpXKXQ8b0xv9aC+YyzrYn0tYZ+udZOWdEus=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jDBjbOyLo60Y2UOp4kxhv5uf+H0B98DmaBATCDOGDUOO4Mwerf3jLDIAj0JGAO5vWwOSMo6UyWICg653BQXw0y0mjMh62p6pgF2v0Om9VjCUfpjiDiPF1s4c5YVgZgNWhPm9byGD95WvVZX4TCSCH0FXBAFujkYMNzjiYqSg4/o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=H3g78vW5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="H3g78vW5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710455029; x=1741991029; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1UvIatx4kpXKXQ8b0xv9aC+YyzrYn0tYZ+udZOWdEus=; b=H3g78vW5+CsEzJvkBjymxqCfcDxRw7DxrybtWnwcjiN+irwvDTe3K1L/ vwOcXlfPaI7Ncf4H9cFTo8CccEIm6ibosKMyh3f8nwDOjgCTgu4OEpnKD WdIVSV+0XbSCU6GbBW72ULtJ0GWJXSqm31KTLvh1bFqa3N7Php/GhJbZh GL+kH8WRg0kVXLStxOnbNgpo1t+/mq9X23NE78Wm+Rx0d/XyAvXRoX9Ru Au9QZ7LNBVuO1lh6q5gyRNTBYhRa74irhvzAuhem9rNsSxio2Sziyx1So BYpyqL3n5QP89k4dUbAhSkBkNWpuGuk8NAVm/SMmXPaOERLWr5XH4gTuW A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11013"; a="5171640" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,126,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="5171640" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Mar 2024 15:23:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,126,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="43358107" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2024 15:23:45 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rktUF-000Dpx-1m; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 22:23:43 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 06:22:48 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Andy Shevchenko , Linus Walleij , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/11] pinctrl: aw9523: Make use of struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION() Message-ID: <202403150648.HPQmT2Ob-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240313235422.180075-5-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240313235422.180075-5-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Hi Andy, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/devel] [also build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/for-next linus/master next-20240314] [cannot apply to v6.8] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/pinctrl-aw9523-Destroy-mutex-on-remove/20240314-075853 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313235422.180075-5-andy.shevchenko%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v1 04/11] pinctrl: aw9523: Make use of struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION() config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403150648.HPQmT2Ob-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403150648.HPQmT2Ob-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403150648.HPQmT2Ob-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c: In function 'aw9523_pmx_get_groups': >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:170:36: error: 'const struct pinfunction' has no member named 'ngrpoups'; did you mean 'ngroups'? 170 | *ngroups = aw9523_pmx[sel].ngrpoups; | ^~~~~~~~ | ngroups vim +170 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c 164 165 static int aw9523_pmx_get_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctl, unsigned int sel, 166 const char * const **groups, 167 unsigned int * const ngroups) 168 { 169 *groups = aw9523_pmx[sel].groups; > 170 *ngroups = aw9523_pmx[sel].ngrpoups; 171 return 0; 172 } 173 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki