From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3814C405FC; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710518062; cv=none; b=h+pl6uhxnG4hEWnrXltj0qE7jMisIoLvOYx14QDF74KpyKGkUEIEyKXhRH/cM/MdgIKwE98Oc4/gM+w2WD1Fms+ESaQHbhzqLntnxgwRNU3Wc2nzlcOXvMM477r7bqss8FB+Qg9mEAqmJxboz+RsRgRszZMuHn1GGukoUAxhONY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710518062; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s0OIHKNEwGIa5s7KPpYL0a1H8D5CL9bczCXQZrpz4DY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PsDnSom28CXaZ+xh6TREcbhfkxCvHlEHgDSWKZFEwtoby+l7/ebvsPM+dz4aJIjcDxtohEfkGDt752LuPUD77bPXEUNovew2QjW8OI9W4zUWWjJ9xdJKc8UlZaV1Gae9JkXbTA1G0aBei5sKmUqxtSns6X/tD64xWBeHJEzWNYE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ZRJi+fCt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ZRJi+fCt" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710518059; x=1742054059; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=s0OIHKNEwGIa5s7KPpYL0a1H8D5CL9bczCXQZrpz4DY=; b=ZRJi+fCtAmSb22rJktzFBgA44wzYeI0ldssmlX+v+oxdJMd48jxRnbre pbFKFch6wFfABugiPKsjIO+bYOJkPsCXJj81xDy+ocCK4J+hRrKlejShk KLsf9LqLwtyeuqKrHegfr282s+VUfWNq6XZcUyQGoI1gJoRyyMwgvigTP j45pzbYeM/KDvoCNT1Qhl1so3sTG4bEmNUEQEOAjPWstOk6WtucRUo8zJ w3hadSbEb4nxlU29m/71e3RfnBUIqrbs1XJfR/+Zk07Uwfm7gvzi0t8CE G6hUPHBl2Kqgu9pWp16x3hsg93pEV3Os3E5Lmpb/MGJUyHFVh6mkZl45T A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11014"; a="5529419" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,128,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="5529419" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2024 08:54:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,128,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="43750025" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2024 08:54:14 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rl9sq-000EZF-1E; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:54:12 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:54:04 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Lukasz Luba , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, lukasz.luba@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sboyd@kernel.org, nm@ti.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, mhiramat@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] PM: EM: Add em_dev_update_chip_binning() Message-ID: <202403152322.1OIlZSAj-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240314140421.3563571-4-lukasz.luba@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240314140421.3563571-4-lukasz.luba@arm.com> Hi Lukasz, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master next-20240315] [cannot apply to krzk/for-next clk/clk-next soc/for-next rafael-pm/acpi-bus rafael-pm/devprop v6.8] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lukasz-Luba/OPP-OF-Export-dev_opp_pm_calc_power-for-usage-from-EM/20240314-220719 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240314140421.3563571-4-lukasz.luba%40arm.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/4] PM: EM: Add em_dev_update_chip_binning() config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20240315 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403152322.1OIlZSAj-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403152322.1OIlZSAj-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403152322.1OIlZSAj-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) kernel/power/energy_model.c:168:15: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *table @@ got struct em_perf_table * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:168:15: sparse: expected struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *table kernel/power/energy_model.c:168:15: sparse: got struct em_perf_table * kernel/power/energy_model.c:169:15: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *objp @@ got struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *table @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:169:15: sparse: expected void const *objp kernel/power/energy_model.c:169:15: sparse: got struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *table kernel/power/energy_model.c:177:15: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *table @@ got struct em_perf_table * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:177:15: sparse: expected struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *table kernel/power/energy_model.c:177:15: sparse: got struct em_perf_table * kernel/power/energy_model.c:179:19: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct callback_head *head @@ got struct callback_head [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:179:19: sparse: expected struct callback_head *head kernel/power/energy_model.c:179:19: sparse: got struct callback_head [noderef] __rcu * kernel/power/energy_model.c:190:19: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct kref *kref @@ got struct kref [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:190:19: sparse: expected struct kref *kref kernel/power/energy_model.c:190:19: sparse: got struct kref [noderef] __rcu * kernel/power/energy_model.c:208:15: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *table @@ got void * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:208:15: sparse: expected struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *table kernel/power/energy_model.c:208:15: sparse: got void * kernel/power/energy_model.c:212:20: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct kref *kref @@ got struct kref [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:212:20: sparse: expected struct kref *kref kernel/power/energy_model.c:212:20: sparse: got struct kref [noderef] __rcu * kernel/power/energy_model.c:328:19: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct kref *kref @@ got struct kref [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:328:19: sparse: expected struct kref *kref kernel/power/energy_model.c:328:19: sparse: got struct kref [noderef] __rcu * kernel/power/energy_model.c:333:45: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct em_perf_state *table @@ got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:333:45: sparse: expected struct em_perf_state *table kernel/power/energy_model.c:333:45: sparse: got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * kernel/power/energy_model.c:433:45: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct em_perf_state *table @@ got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:433:45: sparse: expected struct em_perf_state *table kernel/power/energy_model.c:433:45: sparse: got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * kernel/power/energy_model.c:450:15: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *objp @@ got struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *[assigned] em_table @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:450:15: sparse: expected void const *objp kernel/power/energy_model.c:450:15: sparse: got struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *[assigned] em_table kernel/power/energy_model.c:621:55: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct em_perf_state *table @@ got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:621:55: sparse: expected struct em_perf_state *table kernel/power/energy_model.c:621:55: sparse: got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * kernel/power/energy_model.c:676:16: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct em_perf_state *new_ps @@ got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:676:16: sparse: expected struct em_perf_state *new_ps kernel/power/energy_model.c:676:16: sparse: got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * kernel/power/energy_model.c:694:37: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct em_perf_state *table @@ got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:694:37: sparse: expected struct em_perf_state *table kernel/power/energy_model.c:694:37: sparse: got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * kernel/power/energy_model.c:729:38: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct em_perf_state *table @@ got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/power/energy_model.c:729:38: sparse: expected struct em_perf_state *table kernel/power/energy_model.c:729:38: sparse: got struct em_perf_state [noderef] __rcu * >> kernel/power/energy_model.c:836:53: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression kernel/power/energy_model.c:845:32: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression vim +836 kernel/power/energy_model.c 800 801 /** 802 * em_dev_update_chip_binning() - Update Energy Model with new values after 803 * the new voltage information is present in the OPPs. 804 * @dev : Device for which the Energy Model has to be updated. 805 * 806 * This function allows to update easily the EM with new values available in 807 * the OPP framework and DT. It can be used after the chip has been properly 808 * verified by device drivers and the voltages adjusted for the 'chip binning'. 809 * It uses the "dynamic-power-coefficient" DT property to calculate the power 810 * values for EM. For power calculation it uses the new adjusted voltage 811 * values known for OPPs, which might be changed after boot. 812 */ 813 int em_dev_update_chip_binning(struct device *dev) 814 { 815 struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table; 816 struct em_perf_domain *pd; 817 int i, ret; 818 819 if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)) 820 return -EINVAL; 821 822 pd = em_pd_get(dev); 823 if (!pd) { 824 dev_warn(dev, "Couldn't find Energy Model %d\n", ret); 825 return -EINVAL; 826 } 827 828 em_table = em_table_dup(pd); 829 if (!em_table) { 830 dev_warn(dev, "EM: allocation failed\n"); 831 return -ENOMEM; 832 } 833 834 /* Update power values which might change due to new voltage in OPPs */ 835 for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) { > 836 unsigned long freq = em_table->state[i].frequency; -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki