From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] headers/deps: x86/fpu: Make task_struct::thread constant size
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:54:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240326215435.GB4539@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgMeH9p0BTnMfmOM@gmail.com>
On 03/26, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > > +static struct fpu x86_init_fpu __read_mostly;
> > > +
> > > static void __init fpu__init_system_early_generic(void)
> > > {
> > > + {
> > > + int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > > +
> > > + fpstate_reset(&x86_init_fpu);
> > > + current->thread.fpu = &x86_init_fpu;
> > > + per_cpu(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx, this_cpu) = &x86_init_fpu;
> > > + x86_init_fpu.last_cpu = this_cpu;
> > > + }
> >
> > Can't x86_init_fpu be declared inside the block above?
>
> As a function-local static? I think globals are better defined in a visible
> fashion, not hidden among local variables where they are easy to overlook.
OK, but please see below.
> Yeah. Something like the delta patch below?
LGTM. And the whole patch too, although I don't think I can review it ;)
but... Ingo, let me ask 2 stupid questions.
1. Can you split this patch? I mean, 1/2 should add something like
struct fpu *x86_task_fpu(struct task_struct *task)
{
return &target->thread.fpu;
}
somewhere in arch/x86/include and update all the users of ->thread.fpu
to use the new helper. No functional changes.
This way 2/2 which actually turns .fpu into a pointer will be MUCH simpler.
2. Now, 2/2 should change the new helper above to
return target->thread.fpu;
But! why do we need the thread_struct.fpu pointer at all? Can't we simply have
struct fpu *x86_task_fpu(struct task_struct *task)
{
return (void *)task + sizeof(*task);
}
? This is what fpu_clone() (with your patch) does anyway.
Yes, this needs some changes:
- exit_thread() - trivial
- arch_dup_task_struct() clears thread.fpu, but I guess this is unnecessary
- fpu_clone() initializes dst->thread.fpu, no longer needed
- finally, fpu__init_system_early_generic() which initializes the
init_task.thread.fpu pointer.
But this doesn't look difficult? Although I don't understand the magic in
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S ...
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-26 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-20 13:19 [PATCH 0/1] Fast headers: Make task_struct::thread constant size Ingo Molnar
2024-03-20 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/1] headers/deps: x86/fpu: " Ingo Molnar
2024-03-25 6:00 ` kernel test robot
2024-03-26 17:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-03-26 19:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-03-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 1/1 -v2] " Ingo Molnar
2024-03-26 21:54 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-03-29 9:10 ` [PATCH 2/1] headers/deps: x86/fpu: Remove the thread::fpu pointer Ingo Molnar
2024-03-29 9:45 ` [PATCH 3/1] x86/fpu: Remove init_task FPU state dependencies, add debugging warning Ingo Molnar
2024-03-29 13:41 ` [tip: x86/fpu] x86/vm86: Make sure the free_vm86(task) definition uses its parameter even in the !CONFIG_VM86 case tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240326215435.GB4539@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox