Re: [PATCH v9 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion

Uwe Kleine-König
2024-04-13T08:49:18Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2501 bytes --]

Hello Arnd,

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, at 10:18, Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay wrote:
> > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it via
> > Arnd branch.
>
> Thank you for the continued updates, I really hope we can merge
> it all for 6.10. I've looked through it again and I'm pretty much
> ready to just merge it, though I admit that the process is not
> working out that great, and it would probably have been quicker
> to add DT support to drivers individually through the subsystem
> trees.
>
> > Stephen Boyd, Vinod Koul PLEASE! give some comments on following, couse
> > i hadn't one for a couple of iterations already:
> >
> > Following patches require attention from Stephen Boyd, as they were
> > converted to aux_dev as suggested:
> >
> > - ARM: ep93xx: add regmap aux_dev
> > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx
> >
> > Following patches require attention from Vinod Koul:
> >
> > - dma: cirrus: Convert to DT for Cirrus EP93xx
> > - dma: cirrus: remove platform code
>
> I suspect that Stephen and Vinod may be missing this, as reviewing
> a 38 patch series tends to be a lot of work, and they may have
> missed that they are on the critical path here. I certainly
> tend to just ignore an entire thread when it looks like I'm not
> immediately going to be reviewing it all and other people are
> likely to have more comments first, so I'm not blaming them.
>
> To better catch their attention, I would suggest you repost the
> two smaller sets of patches as a separate series, with only the
> relevant people on Cc. Please also include the respective
> bindings when you send send these patches to Stephen and
> Vinod.

It seems this happend for the clock series; it's at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240408-ep93xx-clk-v1-0-1d0f4c324647@maquefel.me/
and received an ack by Stephen.

Vinod gave some feedback in this thread with some remarks that need
addressing.

With the latter I wonder if the plan to get this as a whole into v6.10
is screwed and if I should pick up the PWM bits (patches #12, #13 and
maybe #38) via my tree. Patch #38 touches arch/arm and
include/linux/soc, so I wouldn't pick that one up without an explicit
ack by (I guess) Arnd.

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]