From: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com, Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 12/36] fuse-bpf: Support mknod/unlink/mkdir/rmdir
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:53:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240329015351.624249-13-drosen@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240329015351.624249-1-drosen@google.com>
This adds backing support for FUSE_MKNOD, FUSE_MKDIR, FUSE_RMDIR,
and FUSE_UNLINK
Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@google.com>
---
fs/fuse/backing.c | 342 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/fuse/dir.c | 14 ++
fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 24 ++++
3 files changed, 380 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/backing.c b/fs/fuse/backing.c
index 317a3adbbb3e..567f859d300c 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/backing.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/backing.c
@@ -947,6 +947,348 @@ int fuse_revalidate_backing(struct dentry *entry, unsigned int flags)
return 1;
}
+struct fuse_mknod_args {
+ struct fuse_mknod_in in;
+ struct fuse_buffer name;
+};
+
+static int fuse_mknod_initialize_in(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, struct fuse_mknod_args *args,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode, dev_t rdev)
+{
+ *args = (struct fuse_mknod_args) {
+ .in = (struct fuse_mknod_in) {
+ .mode = mode,
+ .rdev = new_encode_dev(rdev),
+ .umask = current_umask(),
+ },
+ .name = (struct fuse_buffer) {
+ .data = (void *) entry->d_name.name,
+ .size = entry->d_name.len + 1,
+ .flags = BPF_FUSE_IMMUTABLE,
+ },
+ };
+ *fa = (struct bpf_fuse_args) {
+ .info = (struct bpf_fuse_meta_info) {
+ .nodeid = get_node_id(dir),
+ .opcode = FUSE_MKNOD,
+ },
+ .in_numargs = 2,
+ .in_args[0] = (struct bpf_fuse_arg) {
+ .size = sizeof(args->in),
+ .value = &args->in,
+ },
+ .in_args[1] = (struct bpf_fuse_arg) {
+ .is_buffer = true,
+ .buffer = &args->name,
+ },
+ };
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int fuse_mknod_initialize_out(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, struct fuse_mknod_args *args,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode, dev_t rdev)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int fuse_mknod_backing(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, int *out,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode, dev_t rdev)
+{
+ const struct fuse_mknod_in *fmi = fa->in_args[0].value;
+ struct fuse_inode *fuse_inode = get_fuse_inode(dir);
+ struct inode *backing_inode = fuse_inode->backing_inode;
+ struct path backing_path;
+ struct inode *inode = NULL;
+
+ get_fuse_backing_path(entry, &backing_path);
+ if (!backing_path.dentry)
+ return -EBADF;
+
+ inode_lock_nested(backing_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ mode = fmi->mode;
+ if (!IS_POSIXACL(backing_inode))
+ mode &= ~fmi->umask;
+ *out = vfs_mknod(&nop_mnt_idmap, backing_inode, backing_path.dentry, mode,
+ new_decode_dev(fmi->rdev));
+ inode_unlock(backing_inode);
+ if (*out)
+ goto out;
+ if (d_really_is_negative(backing_path.dentry) ||
+ unlikely(d_unhashed(backing_path.dentry))) {
+ *out = -EINVAL;
+ /**
+ * TODO: overlayfs responds to this situation with a
+ * lookupOneLen. Should we do that too?
+ */
+ goto out;
+ }
+ inode = fuse_iget_backing(dir->i_sb, fuse_inode->nodeid, backing_inode);
+ if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
+ *out = PTR_ERR(inode);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ d_instantiate(entry, inode);
+out:
+ path_put(&backing_path);
+ return *out;
+}
+
+static int fuse_mknod_finalize(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, int *out,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode, dev_t rdev)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int fuse_bpf_mknod(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode, dev_t rdev)
+{
+ return bpf_fuse_backing(dir, struct fuse_mknod_args, out,
+ fuse_mknod_initialize_in, fuse_mknod_initialize_out,
+ fuse_mknod_backing, fuse_mknod_finalize,
+ dir, entry, mode, rdev);
+}
+
+struct fuse_mkdir_args {
+ struct fuse_mkdir_in in;
+ struct fuse_buffer name;
+};
+
+static int fuse_mkdir_initialize_in(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, struct fuse_mkdir_args *args,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode)
+{
+ *args = (struct fuse_mkdir_args) {
+ .in = (struct fuse_mkdir_in) {
+ .mode = mode,
+ .umask = current_umask(),
+ },
+ .name = (struct fuse_buffer) {
+ .data = (void *) entry->d_name.name,
+ .size = entry->d_name.len + 1,
+ .flags = BPF_FUSE_IMMUTABLE,
+ },
+ };
+
+ *fa = (struct bpf_fuse_args) {
+ .info = (struct bpf_fuse_meta_info) {
+ .nodeid = get_node_id(dir),
+ .opcode = FUSE_MKDIR,
+ },
+ .in_numargs = 2,
+ .in_args[0] = (struct bpf_fuse_arg) {
+ .size = sizeof(args->in),
+ .value = &args->in,
+ },
+ .in_args[1] = (struct bpf_fuse_arg) {
+ .value = &args->name,
+ .is_buffer = true,
+ },
+ };
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int fuse_mkdir_initialize_out(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, struct fuse_mkdir_args *args,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int fuse_mkdir_backing(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, int *out,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode)
+{
+ const struct fuse_mkdir_in *fmi = fa->in_args[0].value;
+ struct fuse_inode *fuse_inode = get_fuse_inode(dir);
+ struct inode *backing_inode = fuse_inode->backing_inode;
+ struct path backing_path;
+ struct inode *inode = NULL;
+ struct dentry *d;
+
+ get_fuse_backing_path(entry, &backing_path);
+ if (!backing_path.dentry)
+ return -EBADF;
+
+ inode_lock_nested(backing_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ mode = fmi->mode;
+ if (!IS_POSIXACL(backing_inode))
+ mode &= ~fmi->umask;
+ *out = vfs_mkdir(&nop_mnt_idmap, backing_inode, backing_path.dentry,
+ mode);
+ if (*out)
+ goto out;
+ if (d_really_is_negative(backing_path.dentry) ||
+ unlikely(d_unhashed(backing_path.dentry))) {
+ d = lookup_one_len(entry->d_name.name,
+ backing_path.dentry->d_parent,
+ entry->d_name.len);
+ if (IS_ERR(d)) {
+ *out = PTR_ERR(d);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ dput(backing_path.dentry);
+ backing_path.dentry = d;
+ }
+ inode = fuse_iget_backing(dir->i_sb, fuse_inode->nodeid, backing_inode);
+ if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
+ *out = PTR_ERR(inode);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ d_instantiate(entry, inode);
+out:
+ inode_unlock(backing_inode);
+ path_put(&backing_path);
+ return *out;
+}
+
+static int fuse_mkdir_finalize(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, int *out,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int fuse_bpf_mkdir(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode)
+{
+ return bpf_fuse_backing(dir, struct fuse_mkdir_args, out,
+ fuse_mkdir_initialize_in, fuse_mkdir_initialize_out,
+ fuse_mkdir_backing, fuse_mkdir_finalize,
+ dir, entry, mode);
+}
+
+static int fuse_rmdir_initialize_in(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, struct fuse_buffer *name,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ *name = (struct fuse_buffer) {
+ .data = (void *) entry->d_name.name,
+ .size = entry->d_name.len + 1,
+ .flags = BPF_FUSE_IMMUTABLE,
+ };
+ *fa = (struct bpf_fuse_args) {
+ .info = (struct bpf_fuse_meta_info) {
+ .nodeid = get_node_id(dir),
+ .opcode = FUSE_RMDIR,
+ },
+ .in_numargs = 1,
+ .in_args[0] = (struct bpf_fuse_arg) {
+ .is_buffer = true,
+ .buffer = name,
+ },
+ };
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int fuse_rmdir_initialize_out(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, struct fuse_buffer *name,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int fuse_rmdir_backing(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, int *out,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ struct path backing_path;
+ struct dentry *backing_parent_dentry;
+ struct inode *backing_inode;
+
+ get_fuse_backing_path(entry, &backing_path);
+ if (!backing_path.dentry)
+ return -EBADF;
+
+ backing_parent_dentry = dget_parent(backing_path.dentry);
+ backing_inode = d_inode(backing_parent_dentry);
+
+ inode_lock_nested(backing_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ *out = vfs_rmdir(&nop_mnt_idmap, backing_inode, backing_path.dentry);
+ inode_unlock(backing_inode);
+
+ dput(backing_parent_dentry);
+ if (!*out)
+ d_drop(entry);
+ path_put(&backing_path);
+ return *out;
+}
+
+static int fuse_rmdir_finalize(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int fuse_bpf_rmdir(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ return bpf_fuse_backing(dir, struct fuse_buffer, out,
+ fuse_rmdir_initialize_in, fuse_rmdir_initialize_out,
+ fuse_rmdir_backing, fuse_rmdir_finalize,
+ dir, entry);
+}
+
+static int fuse_unlink_initialize_in(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, struct fuse_buffer *name,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ *name = (struct fuse_buffer) {
+ .data = (void *) entry->d_name.name,
+ .size = entry->d_name.len + 1,
+ .flags = BPF_FUSE_IMMUTABLE,
+ };
+ *fa = (struct bpf_fuse_args) {
+ .info = (struct bpf_fuse_meta_info) {
+ .nodeid = get_node_id(dir),
+ .opcode = FUSE_UNLINK,
+ },
+ .in_numargs = 1,
+ .in_args[0] = (struct bpf_fuse_arg) {
+ .is_buffer = true,
+ .buffer = name,
+ },
+ };
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int fuse_unlink_initialize_out(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, struct fuse_buffer *name,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int fuse_unlink_backing(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ struct path backing_path;
+ struct dentry *backing_parent_dentry;
+ struct inode *backing_inode;
+
+ get_fuse_backing_path(entry, &backing_path);
+ if (!backing_path.dentry)
+ return -EBADF;
+
+ /* TODO Not sure if we should reverify like overlayfs, or get inode from d_parent */
+ backing_parent_dentry = dget_parent(backing_path.dentry);
+ backing_inode = d_inode(backing_parent_dentry);
+
+ inode_lock_nested(backing_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
+ *out = vfs_unlink(&nop_mnt_idmap, backing_inode, backing_path.dentry,
+ NULL);
+ inode_unlock(backing_inode);
+
+ dput(backing_parent_dentry);
+ if (!*out)
+ d_drop(entry);
+ path_put(&backing_path);
+ return *out;
+}
+
+static int fuse_unlink_finalize(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, int *out,
+ struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int fuse_bpf_unlink(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ return bpf_fuse_backing(dir, struct fuse_buffer, out,
+ fuse_unlink_initialize_in, fuse_unlink_initialize_out,
+ fuse_unlink_backing, fuse_unlink_finalize,
+ dir, entry);
+}
+
static int fuse_access_initialize_in(struct bpf_fuse_args *fa, struct fuse_access_in *in,
struct inode *inode, int mask)
{
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
index 09bb4c63fd71..a5b6aef788b2 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -957,6 +957,10 @@ static int fuse_mknod(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
struct fuse_mknod_in inarg;
struct fuse_mount *fm = get_fuse_mount(dir);
FUSE_ARGS(args);
+ int err;
+
+ if (fuse_bpf_mknod(&err, dir, entry, mode, rdev))
+ return err;
if (!fm->fc->dont_mask)
mode &= ~current_umask();
@@ -1003,6 +1007,10 @@ static int fuse_mkdir(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
struct fuse_mkdir_in inarg;
struct fuse_mount *fm = get_fuse_mount(dir);
FUSE_ARGS(args);
+ int err;
+
+ if (fuse_bpf_mkdir(&err, dir, entry, mode))
+ return err;
if (!fm->fc->dont_mask)
mode &= ~current_umask();
@@ -1089,6 +1097,9 @@ static int fuse_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
if (fuse_is_bad(dir))
return -EIO;
+ if (fuse_bpf_unlink(&err, dir, entry))
+ return err;
+
args.opcode = FUSE_UNLINK;
args.nodeid = get_node_id(dir);
args.in_numargs = 1;
@@ -1112,6 +1123,9 @@ static int fuse_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
if (fuse_is_bad(dir))
return -EIO;
+ if (fuse_bpf_rmdir(&err, dir, entry))
+ return err;
+
args.opcode = FUSE_RMDIR;
args.nodeid = get_node_id(dir);
args.in_numargs = 1;
diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
index a133010fde1c..9b176f78999f 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
+++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
@@ -1441,6 +1441,10 @@ int parse_fuse_bpf_entry(struct fuse_bpf_entry *fbe, int num_entries);
int fuse_bpf_open(int *err, struct inode *inode, struct file *file, bool isdir);
int fuse_bpf_create_open(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry,
struct file *file, unsigned int flags, umode_t mode);
+int fuse_bpf_mknod(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode, dev_t rdev);
+int fuse_bpf_mkdir(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode);
+int fuse_bpf_rmdir(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry);
+int fuse_bpf_unlink(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry);
int fuse_bpf_release(int *out, struct inode *inode, struct fuse_file *ff);
int fuse_bpf_releasedir(int *out, struct inode *inode, struct fuse_file *ff);
int fuse_bpf_lseek(loff_t *out, struct inode *inode, struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence);
@@ -1461,6 +1465,26 @@ static inline int fuse_bpf_create_open(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentr
return 0;
}
+static inline int fuse_bpf_mknod(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode, dev_t rdev)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int fuse_bpf_mkdir(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry, umode_t mode)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int fuse_bpf_rmdir(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int fuse_bpf_unlink(int *out, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *entry)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline int fuse_bpf_release(int *out, struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
return 0;
--
2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-29 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-29 1:53 [RFC PATCH v4 00/36] Fuse-BPF and plans on merging with Fuse Passthrough Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/36] fuse-bpf: Update fuse side uapi Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/36] fuse-bpf: Add data structures for fuse-bpf Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/36] fuse-bpf: Prepare for fuse-bpf patch Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/36] fuse: Add fuse-bpf, a stacked fs extension for FUSE Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/36] fuse-bpf: Add ioctl interface for /dev/fuse Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/36] fuse-bpf: Don't support export_operations Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/36] fuse-bpf: Add support for access Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/36] fuse-bpf: Partially add mapping support Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/36] fuse-bpf: Add lseek support Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/36] fuse-bpf: Add support for fallocate Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/36] fuse-bpf: Support file/dir open/close Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` Daniel Rosenberg [this message]
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/36] fuse-bpf: Add support for read/write iter Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/36] fuse-bpf: support readdir Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/36] fuse-bpf: Add support for sync operations Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/36] fuse-bpf: Add Rename support Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/36] fuse-bpf: Add attr support Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/36] fuse-bpf: Add support for FUSE_COPY_FILE_RANGE Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/36] fuse-bpf: Add xattr support Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/36] fuse-bpf: Add symlink/link support Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/36] fuse-bpf: Add partial flock support Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/36] fuse-bpf: Add partial ioctl support Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/36] fuse-bpf: allow mounting with no userspace daemon Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/36] fuse-bpf: Add fuse-bpf constants Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/36] bpf: Increase struct_op max members Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/36] WIP: bpf: Add fuse_ops struct_op programs Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 27/36] fuse-bpf: Export Functions Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 28/36] fuse: Provide registration functions for fuse-bpf Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 29/36] fuse-bpf: Set fuse_ops at mount or lookup time Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 30/36] fuse-bpf: Call bpf for pre/post filters Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 31/36] fuse-bpf: Add userspace " Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 32/36] WIP: fuse-bpf: add error_out Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 33/36] fuse-bpf: Add default filter op Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 34/36] tools: Add FUSE, update bpf includes Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 35/36] fuse-bpf: Add selftests Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 1:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 36/36] fuse: Provide easy way to test fuse struct_op call Daniel Rosenberg
2024-03-29 6:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/36] Fuse-BPF and plans on merging with Fuse Passthrough Amir Goldstein
2024-03-30 0:59 ` Daniel Rosenberg
2024-04-01 14:43 ` Amir Goldstein
2024-04-01 20:27 ` Bernd Schubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240329015351.624249-13-drosen@google.com \
--to=drosen@google.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=paullawrence@google.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox