public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] task_work: Introduce task_work_cancel() again
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 00:58:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240329235812.18917-3-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240329235812.18917-1-frederic@kernel.org>

Re-introduce task_work_cancel(), this time to cancel an actual callback
and not *any* callback pointing to a given function. This is going to be
needed for perf events event freeing.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/task_work.h |  1 +
 kernel/task_work.c        | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/task_work.h b/include/linux/task_work.h
index 89ee2cbf044b..58e42ef59580 100644
--- a/include/linux/task_work.h
+++ b/include/linux/task_work.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ int task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *twork,
 struct callback_head *task_work_cancel_match(struct task_struct *task,
 	bool (*match)(struct callback_head *, void *data), void *data);
 struct callback_head *task_work_cancel_func(struct task_struct *, task_work_func_t);
+bool task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *, struct callback_head *twork);
 void task_work_run(void);
 
 static inline void exit_task_work(struct task_struct *task)
diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
index c1b4d3ba2590..9e85ac7632ae 100644
--- a/kernel/task_work.c
+++ b/kernel/task_work.c
@@ -136,6 +136,30 @@ task_work_cancel_func(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func)
 	return task_work_cancel_match(task, task_work_func_match, func);
 }
 
+static bool task_work_match(struct callback_head *cb, void *data)
+{
+	return cb == data;
+}
+
+/**
+ * task_work_cancel - cancel a pending work added by task_work_add()
+ * @task: the task which should execute the work
+ * @func: the work to remove if queued
+ *
+ * Remove a callback from a task's queue if queued.
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * True if the callback was queued and got cancelled, false otherwise.
+ */
+bool task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *cb)
+{
+	struct callback_head *ret;
+
+	ret = task_work_cancel_match(task, task_work_match, cb);
+
+	return ret == cb;
+}
+
 /**
  * task_work_run - execute the works added by task_work_add()
  *
-- 
2.44.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-29 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-29 23:58 [PATCH 0/4] perf: Fix leaked events when sigtrap = 1 Frederic Weisbecker
2024-03-29 23:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: s/task_work_cancel()/task_work_cancel_func()/ Frederic Weisbecker
2024-03-29 23:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-03-30 21:10   ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: Introduce task_work_cancel() again kernel test robot
2024-03-29 23:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: Fix event leak upon exit Frederic Weisbecker
2024-03-29 23:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release Frederic Weisbecker
2024-03-30  3:23 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf: Fix leaked events when sigtrap = 1 Ian Rogers
2024-04-08 19:43   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-04-08 20:20     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-08 20:58       ` Frederic Weisbecker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-15 14:43 [PATCH 0/4 v2] perf: Fix leaked sigtrap events Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 14:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: Introduce task_work_cancel() again Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16 14:09 [PATCH 0/4 v3] perf: Fix leaked sigtrap events Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16 14:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: Introduce task_work_cancel() again Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-21  9:15 [PATCH 0/4 v4] perf: Fix leaked sigtrap events Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-21  9:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: Introduce task_work_cancel() again Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240329235812.18917-3-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox