From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 818DA1E531; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712102329; cv=none; b=ZeX5e2AflCteWwqAg4JgIuDAeIXzBHXj9oR/ZSuGRpeMPTVW7GblO6+iYq5mDpqSlE84SkU+biN8RGqp81mgbltoSoZ3+W9vgpkQblMeHkiIpMGCrFxEOtigWm5EbGh7y6SFIgmTcP1NA/HJioidKA73X0I+YxFz7MncWiHB9Os= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712102329; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AiuyQ6KpY5OwIl/kOANr37LCmsygVJ4gTNLbVO+SnCQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=C8Mz8SgTa0E2UkJ0eDOJedvCeO3bqSbLSx+D0tNd5azrNYnjkbm9Ft3qw7hIyjJ3QM8lFYbBuByRIeqg3QA89rtYlU8Ww+3IAR7sshEcj4L0aAPdpE3lSj0E84tbTvzkZ3MRyeuje2D7cmgrZ7h/1WurN7/QjJD0Uo2dWx1iLlI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=PEJJa9vz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="PEJJa9vz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712102328; x=1743638328; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=AiuyQ6KpY5OwIl/kOANr37LCmsygVJ4gTNLbVO+SnCQ=; b=PEJJa9vzTwI9OfBN9sBgPm5CO2qLoFDVxA205xXP5nV2OHWFQ302z9rt T/e3YgKZrKMLTdv5RMho50d8BmYZ+tL63pedt0i9wzxTw6APi6rOmlO7R ylYG0+o6E3GUaNqK+Ym2Z/KdCSxar8kS+QFO+uxlHhK+K+IPqC/e6H2bs 5DLBtNWCHcs1JipEF34W1+7uG2YCGPJuBvBsoY1ZGoM7Um78tK6ZL8Zf1 9K21RcWn/cmYkBcBiP72A6YHYjY9OkP0Cb08YT/kyQnwv7Hnnn+8FeJyp ZXm+tuDznX+TMUCjtWtuf95P9nYu5/+pLsDbVYXtjnWH/OPaham9C+2Dt A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CcYpB11VRkygaPfiacoOvg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9DhA4FAlSjWyYTRImD9ucA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11032"; a="24800363" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,176,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="24800363" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Apr 2024 16:58:46 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /0rSqutbSYGezZVceapNnQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lJpG4qfoR8CBvsXJYGdm2g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,176,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="18058838" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 90ee3aa53dbd) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa010.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Apr 2024 16:58:43 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 90ee3aa53dbd with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rro1Y-0001dt-1Y; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 23:58:40 +0000 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:58:05 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Dawei Li , will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com, yangyicong@hisilicon.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Dawei Li Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] perf/arm_dsu: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation from stack Message-ID: <202404030702.vL5Ep98R-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240402105610.1695644-5-dawei.li@shingroup.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240402105610.1695644-5-dawei.li@shingroup.cn> Hi Dawei, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.9-rc2 next-20240402] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dawei-Li/perf-alibaba_uncore_drw-Avoid-explicit-cpumask-var-allocation-from-stack/20240402-192244 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240402105610.1695644-5-dawei.li%40shingroup.cn patch subject: [PATCH 4/9] perf/arm_dsu: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation from stack config: arm64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240403/202404030702.vL5Ep98R-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240403/202404030702.vL5Ep98R-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404030702.vL5Ep98R-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c: In function 'dsu_pmu_get_online_cpu_any_but': >> drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c:243:31: error: passing argument 1 of 'cpumask_any_but' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 243 | ret = cpumask_any_but(&online_supported, cpu); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | | struct cpumask (*)[1] In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h:26, from arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h:11, from arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:10, from include/linux/irqflags.h:18, from include/linux/spinlock.h:59, from include/linux/mmzone.h:8, from include/linux/gfp.h:7, from include/linux/slab.h:16, from include/linux/resource_ext.h:11, from include/linux/acpi.h:13, from drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c:14: include/linux/cpumask.h:379:52: note: expected 'const struct cpumask *' but argument is of type 'struct cpumask (*)[1]' 379 | unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/cpumask_any_but +243 drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c 232 233 static unsigned int dsu_pmu_get_online_cpu_any_but(struct dsu_pmu *dsu_pmu, int cpu) 234 { 235 cpumask_var_t online_supported; 236 unsigned int ret; 237 238 if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&online_supported, GFP_KERNEL)) 239 return -ENOMEM; 240 241 cpumask_and(online_supported, 242 &dsu_pmu->associated_cpus, cpu_online_mask); > 243 ret = cpumask_any_but(&online_supported, cpu); 244 245 free_cpumask_var(online_supported); 246 247 return ret; 248 } 249 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki