public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhi@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] PCI: endpoint: Rename core_init() callback in 'struct pci_epc_event_ops' to init()
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 21:21:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240403155147.GA85162@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240403134600.GL25309@thinkpad>

On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 07:16:05PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:52:10PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 09:20:29PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > core_init() callback is used to notify the EPC initialization event to the
> > > EPF drivers. The 'core' prefix was used indicate that the controller IP
> > > core has completed initialization. But it serves no purpose as the EPF
> > > driver will only care about the EPC initialization as a whole and there is
> > > no real benefit to distinguish the IP core part.
> > > 
> > > So let's rename the core_init() callback in 'struct pci_epc_event_ops' to
> > > just init() to make it more clear.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c  |  4 ++--
> > >  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c |  4 ++--
> > >  drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c           | 16 ++++++++--------
> > >  include/linux/pci-epf.h                       |  4 ++--
> > >  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > > index 280863c0eeb9..b3c26ffd29a5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> > > @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_dma_deinit(struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi)
> > >  	epf_mhi->dma_chan_rx = NULL;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static int pci_epf_mhi_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > > +static int pci_epf_mhi_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
> > >  	const struct pci_epf_mhi_ep_info *info = epf_mhi->info;
> > > @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static const struct pci_epc_event_ops pci_epf_mhi_epc_event_ops = {
> > > -	.core_init = pci_epf_mhi_core_init,
> > > +	.init = pci_epf_mhi_epc_init,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  static const struct pci_epc_bus_event_ops pci_epf_mhi_bus_event_ops = {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > > index 973db0b1bde2..abcb6ca61c4e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > > @@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > > +static int pci_epf_test_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > 
> > On V1 you agreed that it is better to remove 'epc' from the naming.
> > (For both pci-epf-test and pci-epf-mhi).
> > You seem to have forgotten to address this for V2.
> > 
> 
> Oh yeah, sorry about that. I tried to address comments for both series and
> apparently this one got missed.
> 

Ok, now I remember that I kept the prefix intentionally. The module init
functions are already named as pci_epf_{test/mhi}_init(), so cannot use the same
name for the callback also. And using some other name didn't fit, so I kept
'epc' as the prefix since the callback acts on the EPC initialization event
anyway.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-03 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-01 15:50 [PATCH v2 00/10] PCI: endpoint: Make host reboot handling more robust Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-01 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] PCI: qcom-ep: Disable resources unconditionally during PERST# assert Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-01 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] PCI: endpoint: Decouple EPC and PCIe bus specific events Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02  0:14   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-04-03 14:26     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-04  2:40       ` Damien Le Moal
2024-04-01 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] PCI: endpoint: Rename core_init() callback in 'struct pci_epc_event_ops' to init() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02 10:52   ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-03 13:46     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-03 15:51       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-04-01 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] PCI: epf-test: Refactor pci_epf_test_unbind() function Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-01 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] PCI: epf-{mhi/test}: Move DMA initialization to EPC init callback Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-01 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] PCI: endpoint: Introduce EPC 'deinit' event and notify the EPF drivers Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-01 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] PCI: dwc: ep: Add a generic dw_pcie_ep_linkdown() API to handle Link Down event Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02 10:52   ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-01 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] PCI: qcom-ep: Use the " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-01 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] PCI: epf-test: Handle " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-01 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] PCI: qcom: Implement shutdown() callback to properly reset the endpoint devices Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02 11:18   ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-03 13:32     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-03 20:03       ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-09 13:31         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-04-10 10:54         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-10 14:52           ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-10 21:10             ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-12  6:32               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02  9:41 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] PCI: endpoint: Make host reboot handling more robust Niklas Cassel
2024-04-03 13:48   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-08  9:49     ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-02 10:52 ` Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240403155147.GA85162@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox