From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 860F88462; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 15:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712243343; cv=none; b=YQpoaAwXGxpq0bbwsl1s8d5g9YhyLiHt43sQUVW0GDsVhGxcfZmmNKOkvZabrkdRCVPSbd8WOYLEeYO6xgbv8jKhh/LijsstDEdKYG+ijZ139HMz0469QR8WFGzdpMF+3ABe3QQucbxrGwZLbD31OzKBgZdGVdsdVtjVbTCOQws= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712243343; c=relaxed/simple; bh=18aB/XLKObpkrhvc/1QTpS7jlg0StA4y0wO7Ck7oB8Q=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pDYbzv8E0IzS19ungD9W+2KpVutu5D+iMpXjjUYoOqDFk5L+elTXPb6FpMgyKTc+oO44q8h1giccajLoDrmkDoP7FMLd6AuxelIAlZxrgoKGnLUDXS+sQtNTy4IG9Qn9V9v0TJeF6wxnA1CGCLjyUSfxVCUSpnx2xPG/TDjvV40= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=Huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=Huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V9Q2v3Sq0z6J9bP; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:07:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1AFE140A77; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:08:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.227.76) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:08:57 +0100 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:08:56 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Ira Weiny CC: Dave Jiang , Fan Ni , "Navneet Singh" , Dan Williams , Davidlohr Bueso , Alison Schofield , Vishal Verma , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/26] cxl/pci: Delay event buffer allocation Message-ID: <20240404160856.000035e2@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20240324-dcd-type2-upstream-v1-11-b7b00d623625@intel.com> References: <20240324-dcd-type2-upstream-v1-0-b7b00d623625@intel.com> <20240324-dcd-type2-upstream-v1-11-b7b00d623625@intel.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.25) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 16:18:14 -0700 Ira Weiny wrote: > The event buffer does not need to be allocated if something has failed > in setting up event irq's. > > In prep for adjusting event configuration for DCD events move the buffer > allocation to the end of the event configuration. > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron