public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] perf annotate: Check annotation lines more efficiently
Date: Thu,  4 Apr 2024 10:57:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240404175716.1225482-5-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404175716.1225482-1-namhyung@kernel.org>

In some places, it checks annotated (disasm) lines for each byte.  But
as it already has a list of disasm lines, it'd be better to traverse the
list entries instead of checking every offset with linear search (by
annotated_source__get_line() helper).

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 2409d7424c71..d98fc248ba5b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -383,12 +383,19 @@ struct annotation_line *annotated_source__get_line(struct annotated_source *src,
 
 static unsigned annotation__count_insn(struct annotation *notes, u64 start, u64 end)
 {
+	struct annotation_line *al;
 	unsigned n_insn = 0;
-	u64 offset;
 
-	for (offset = start; offset <= end; offset++) {
-		if (annotated_source__get_line(notes->src, offset))
-			n_insn++;
+	al = annotated_source__get_line(notes->src, start);
+	if (al == NULL)
+		return 0;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_from(al, &notes->src->source, node) {
+		if (al->offset == -1)
+			continue;
+		if ((u64)al->offset > end)
+			break;
+		n_insn++;
 	}
 	return n_insn;
 }
@@ -405,10 +412,10 @@ static void annotation__count_and_fill(struct annotation *notes, u64 start, u64
 {
 	unsigned n_insn;
 	unsigned int cover_insn = 0;
-	u64 offset;
 
 	n_insn = annotation__count_insn(notes, start, end);
 	if (n_insn && ch->num && ch->cycles) {
+		struct annotation_line *al;
 		struct annotated_branch *branch;
 		float ipc = n_insn / ((double)ch->cycles / (double)ch->num);
 
@@ -416,11 +423,16 @@ static void annotation__count_and_fill(struct annotation *notes, u64 start, u64
 		if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff)
 			return;
 
-		for (offset = start; offset <= end; offset++) {
-			struct annotation_line *al;
+		al = annotated_source__get_line(notes->src, start);
+		if (al == NULL)
+			return;
 
-			al = annotated_source__get_line(notes->src, offset);
-			if (al && al->cycles && al->cycles->ipc == 0.0) {
+		list_for_each_entry_from(al, &notes->src->source, node) {
+			if (al->offset == -1)
+				continue;
+			if ((u64)al->offset > end)
+				break;
+			if (al->cycles && al->cycles->ipc == 0.0) {
 				al->cycles->ipc = ipc;
 				cover_insn++;
 			}
@@ -1268,13 +1280,16 @@ void symbol__annotate_decay_histogram(struct symbol *sym, int evidx)
 {
 	struct annotation *notes = symbol__annotation(sym);
 	struct sym_hist *h = annotation__histogram(notes, evidx);
-	int len = symbol__size(sym), offset;
+	struct annotation_line *al;
 
 	h->nr_samples = 0;
-	for (offset = 0; offset < len; ++offset) {
+	list_for_each_entry(al, &notes->src->source, node) {
 		struct sym_hist_entry *entry;
 
-		entry = annotated_source__hist_entry(notes->src, evidx, offset);
+		if (al->offset == -1)
+			continue;
+
+		entry = annotated_source__hist_entry(notes->src, evidx, al->offset);
 		if (entry == NULL)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1334,33 +1349,32 @@ bool disasm_line__is_valid_local_jump(struct disasm_line *dl, struct symbol *sym
 static void
 annotation__mark_jump_targets(struct annotation *notes, struct symbol *sym)
 {
-	u64 offset, size = symbol__size(sym);
+	struct annotation_line *al;
 
 	/* PLT symbols contain external offsets */
 	if (strstr(sym->name, "@plt"))
 		return;
 
-	for (offset = 0; offset < size; ++offset) {
-		struct annotation_line *al;
+	list_for_each_entry(al, &notes->src->source, node) {
 		struct disasm_line *dl;
+		struct annotation_line *target;
 
-		al = annotated_source__get_line(notes->src, offset);
 		dl = disasm_line(al);
 
 		if (!disasm_line__is_valid_local_jump(dl, sym))
 			continue;
 
-		al = notes->src->offsets[dl->ops.target.offset];
-
+		target = annotated_source__get_line(notes->src,
+						    dl->ops.target.offset);
 		/*
 		 * FIXME: Oops, no jump target? Buggy disassembler? Or do we
 		 * have to adjust to the previous offset?
 		 */
-		if (al == NULL)
+		if (target == NULL)
 			continue;
 
-		if (++al->jump_sources > notes->max_jump_sources)
-			notes->max_jump_sources = al->jump_sources;
+		if (++target->jump_sources > notes->max_jump_sources)
+			notes->max_jump_sources = target->jump_sources;
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-04 17:57 [PATCHSET 0/9] perf annotate: More memory footprint reduction Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf annotate: Fix annotation_calc_lines() Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf annotate: Staticize some local functions Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf annotate: Introduce annotated_source__get_line() Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf annotate: Get rid of offsets array Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf annotate: Move widths struct to annotated_source Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 7/9] perf annotate: Move max_jump_sources " Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 8/9] perf annotate: Move nr_events " Namhyung Kim
2024-04-04 17:57 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf annotate: Move start field " Namhyung Kim
2024-04-05 23:41   ` Ian Rogers
2024-04-05 23:44 ` [PATCHSET 0/9] perf annotate: More memory footprint reduction Ian Rogers
2024-04-08 13:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240404175716.1225482-5-namhyung@kernel.org \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox