Re: [PATCH 0/4] DONOTMERGE: ep93xx-clk from ep93xx device tree conversion

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1465 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 05:09:35PM +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Hi Nikita,
> 
> On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 14:48 +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 18:03 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 11:09:52AM +0300, Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay
> > > wrote:
> > > > The goal is to recieve ACKs.
> > > 
> > > I dont see a maintainers entry in -rc1 for the drivers/soc/cirrus
> > > portion. Who is gonna give you an Ack for that portion? If you
> > > intended
> > > maintaining that driver, should you not add a MAINTAINERS entry for
> > > it?
> > 
> > drivers/soc/cirrus got it's ACK from ep93xx MAINTAINER - Alexander
> > Sverdlin.
> > 
> > Arnd, Alexander - should we add it now ?
> 
> seems that we have couple of things to fix:
> 
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #51: 
> new file mode 100644
> 
> WARNING: please write a help paragraph that fully describes the config symbol
> #60: FILE: drivers/soc/cirrus/Kconfig:5:
> +config EP93XX_SOC
> +	bool "Cirrus EP93xx chips SoC"
> +	select SOC_BUS
> +	select AUXILIARY_BUS
> +	default y if !EP93XX_SOC_COMMON
> +	help
> +	  Support SoC for Cirrus EP93xx chips.
> +
> 
> total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 269 lines checked

FWIW, I wouldn't be too worried about meeting the minimum line check for
the Kconfig option that checkpatch requires - but the description here
is not clear what the driver does. 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]