From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/pvqspinlock: Use try_cmpxchg() in qspinlock_paravirt.h
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:22:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240411192317.25432-2-ubizjak@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411192317.25432-1-ubizjak@gmail.com>
Use try_cmpxchg(*ptr, &old, new) instead of
cmpxchg(*ptr, old, new) == old in qspinlock_paravirt.h
x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in ZF flag, so
this change saves a compare after cmpxchg.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
v2: Correct a build error in __pv_queued_spin_unlock().
---
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
index 77ba80bd95f9..f5a36e67b593 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
@@ -86,9 +86,10 @@ static inline bool pv_hybrid_queued_unfair_trylock(struct qspinlock *lock)
*/
for (;;) {
int val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+ u8 old = 0;
if (!(val & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) &&
- (cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->locked, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) == 0)) {
+ try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->locked, &old, _Q_LOCKED_VAL)) {
lockevent_inc(pv_lock_stealing);
return true;
}
@@ -211,8 +212,9 @@ static struct qspinlock **pv_hash(struct qspinlock *lock, struct pv_node *node)
int hopcnt = 0;
for_each_hash_entry(he, offset, hash) {
+ struct qspinlock *old = NULL;
hopcnt++;
- if (!cmpxchg(&he->lock, NULL, lock)) {
+ if (try_cmpxchg(&he->lock, &old, lock)) {
WRITE_ONCE(he->node, node);
lockevent_pv_hop(hopcnt);
return &he->lock;
@@ -355,7 +357,7 @@ static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node, struct mcs_spinlock *prev)
static void pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
{
struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node;
-
+ enum vcpu_state old = vcpu_halted;
/*
* If the vCPU is indeed halted, advance its state to match that of
* pv_wait_node(). If OTOH this fails, the vCPU was running and will
@@ -372,8 +374,7 @@ static void pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
* subsequent writes.
*/
smp_mb__before_atomic();
- if (cmpxchg_relaxed(&pn->state, vcpu_halted, vcpu_hashed)
- != vcpu_halted)
+ if (!try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&pn->state, &old, vcpu_hashed))
return;
/*
@@ -541,15 +542,14 @@ __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u8 locked)
#ifndef __pv_queued_spin_unlock
__visible __lockfunc void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
{
- u8 locked;
+ u8 locked = _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
/*
* We must not unlock if SLOW, because in that case we must first
* unhash. Otherwise it would be possible to have multiple @lock
* entries, which would be BAD.
*/
- locked = cmpxchg_release(&lock->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, 0);
- if (likely(locked == _Q_LOCKED_VAL))
+ if (try_cmpxchg_release(&lock->locked, &locked, 0))
return;
__pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(lock, locked);
--
2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 19:22 [PATCH v2 1/2] locking/pvqspinlock: Use try_cmpxchg_acquire() in trylock_clear_pending() Uros Bizjak
2024-04-11 19:22 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2024-04-12 9:21 ` [tip: locking/core] locking/pvqspinlock: Use try_cmpxchg() in qspinlock_paravirt.h tip-bot2 for Uros Bizjak
2024-04-12 9:46 ` tip-bot2 for Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240411192317.25432-2-ubizjak@gmail.com \
--to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox