From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: relax linkat() AT_EMPTY_PATH - aka flink() - requirements
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:41:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240413-aufgaben-feigen-e61a1ec3668f@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiYnnv7Kw7v+Cp2xU6_Fd-qxQMZuuxZ61LgA2=Gtftw-A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:43:06AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Side note: I'd really like to relax another unrelated AT_EMPTY_PATH
> issue: we should just allow a NULL path for that case.
>
> The requirement that you pass an actual empty string is insane. It's
> wrong. And it adds a noticeable amount of expense to this path,
> because just getting the single byte and looking it up is fairly
> expensive.
>
> This was more noticeable because glibc at one point (still?) did
>
> newfstatat(6, "", buf, AT_EMPTY_PATH)
>
> when it should have just done a simple "fstat()".
>
> So there were (are?) a *LOT* of AT_EMPTY_PATH users, and they all do a
> pointless "let's copy a string from user space".
>
> And yes, I know exactly why AT_EMPTY_PATH exists: because POSIX
> traditionally says that a path of "" has to return -ENOENT, not the
> current working directory. So AT_EMPTY_PATH basically says "allow the
> empty path for lookup".
>
> But while it *allows* the empty path, it does't *force* it, so it
> doesn't mean "avoid the lookup", and we really end up doing a lot of
> extra work just for this case. Just the user string copy is a big deal
> because of the whole overhead of accessing user space, but it's also
> the whole "allocate memory for the path etc".
>
> If we either said "a NULL path with AT_EMPTY_PATH means empty", or
> even just added a new AT_NULL_PATH thing that means "path has to be
> NULL, and it means the same as AT_EMPTY_PATH with an empty path", we'd
> be able to avoid quite a bit of pointless work.
It also causes issues for sandboxed enviroments (most recently for the
Chrome sandbox) because AT_EMPTY_PATH doesn't actually mean
AT_EMPTY_PATH unless the string is actually empty. Otherwise
AT_EMPTY_PATH is ignored. So I'm all on board for this. I need to think
a bit whether AT_NULL_PATH or just allowing NULL would be nicer. Mostly
because I want to ensure that userspace can easily detect this new
feature.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-13 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 0:10 [PATCH] vfs: relax linkat() AT_EMPTY_PATH - aka flink() - requirements Linus Torvalds
2024-04-11 0:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-11 2:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-11 9:04 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-11 12:25 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-11 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-12 8:56 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-11 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-11 16:44 ` Charles Mirabile
2024-04-11 17:29 ` Charles Mirabile
2024-04-11 17:35 ` Charles Mirabile
2024-04-11 18:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-11 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-12 7:45 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-12 15:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-11 20:08 ` Charles Mirabile
2024-04-11 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-12 6:44 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-12 6:41 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-12 9:07 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-12 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-13 9:41 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-04-13 15:16 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-13 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-04-12 19:22 ` [PATCH] " Charles Mirabile
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240413-aufgaben-feigen-e61a1ec3668f@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox