From: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
To: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [bisected] Kernel v6.9-rc3 fails to boot on a Thinkpad T60 with MITIGATION_RETHUNK=y (regression from v6.8.5)
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:49:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240413124901.7f1a8e51@yea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68e3503c-5573-4d82-8fb0-5b955c212d67@leemhuis.info>
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:46:09 +0200
"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> On 13.04.24 11:19, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>
> There was an earlier report about this here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/78e0d19c-b77a-4169-a80f-2eef91f4a1d6@gmail.com/
>
> Boris there suggested: "perhaps we should make
> CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETHUNK depend on !X86_32":
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403173059.GJZg2SUwS8MXw7CdwF@fat_crate.local/
>
> But that did not happen afaics. Would it be wise to go down that path?
>
> Ciao, Thorsten
Ah I see. Well in my case it's no old P4 heater but a not that ancient T2400 Intel Core Duo with 31W TDP. ;)
But good to hear I would not need CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETHUNK anyhow? If that's the case depending on !X86_32 would make sense. Don't know whether the 32bit Intel Atoms (the only 'recent' X86_32 CPU left besides the Core Duo) would need this mitigation.
Regards,
Erhard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-13 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-13 0:49 [bisected] Kernel v6.9-rc3 fails to boot on a Thinkpad T60 with MITIGATION_RETHUNK=y (regression from v6.8.5) Erhard Furtner
2024-04-13 9:19 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-04-13 9:46 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-13 10:49 ` Erhard Furtner [this message]
2024-04-14 8:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-04-14 9:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-04-17 8:38 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-17 8:40 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240413124901.7f1a8e51@yea \
--to=erhard_f@mailbox.org \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox