From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB13573191; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713189429; cv=none; b=oDApnSIqs1CK8Yi6INrauP6ylHnMyihfXZAFbjyTu1atZHzmc3oTj1HFN/5BxT3cpuevkCXJu6N05K9Gx6qERCf+EZQAvKP5pEgzcMyNG/wEAD7lm6eRj35I1CcQeDfo9GYUH5RZRUf2+/8RrCxv0K5DK2YXtIGdTKkN3nATkiQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713189429; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FFFmuk3Sh3rIjA2N2SIYnU2di8Sv7qRk0RmCi36RXX8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Jrx2TPp5xz6VMwT31ewgSrkULKTX+7uHAK6/TJpVucxuRxLT7BC/L4+1jhcgOS178GBNpgTO9IZCMM/IyAw+LEz8We7Y1TVNDo1GGSm8bOoG7nI6fpFZWJi4TW/ECjDFKc7LRi8FRp6u/J7kagvettxX/4KB4nstaLT1+ieG8jU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=COmuzEfp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="COmuzEfp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1713189427; x=1744725427; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=FFFmuk3Sh3rIjA2N2SIYnU2di8Sv7qRk0RmCi36RXX8=; b=COmuzEfp4RVYN18BF7FPy+b0fnoQYPYfaJ8jCAmRmKPgf5US4qVSdBkm wI21NRHzdfBD/J5PvdHhFQMSmAlLAHAyHzX1nuB+CmSiN3NHA2T7SWvS1 dphZM4TVNOWuEZd7eCXeXUjZ4upfnBUABbGKdnimqLMp1BqYbfOsbybl0 pPCnDTTMsB9Bpx5eghiqJKpYre1SbZRQ8ukULj+xzu2chA3vu9C+xPFI/ 0WNRhwm9Hjywacpo52edBmrev6kYEtMeIaHfy150R8w8GpUeu/FWdhg7g Hxd85VVopF2WFkvbPEKMt1XXMk75SYhITA2RU/JfFpvE6pABo9Dmath6V Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8wwhY1sgRcCEIu+tzFv37A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: YSWmDJT1Ra6vy6AVLGs5ew== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11045"; a="19972042" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,203,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="19972042" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Apr 2024 06:57:06 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 7+1nZ9cnT7+N2KghsnO28Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: T2yAK3UEQfSyJQcpT7LylA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,203,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="26485040" Received: from unknown (HELO 23c141fc0fd8) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2024 06:57:03 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 23c141fc0fd8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rwMpR-0004Cs-0C; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:57:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 21:56:52 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Cristian Marussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mailbox: arm_mhuv3: Add driver Message-ID: <202404152144.RtJxmEsQ-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240412192801.554464-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240412192801.554464-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Hi Cristian, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next] [also build test ERROR on soc/for-next linus/master v6.9-rc4 next-20240415] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Cristian-Marussi/dt-bindings-mailbox-arm-mhuv3-Add-bindings/20240415-094106 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412192801.554464-3-cristian.marussi%40arm.com patch subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] mailbox: arm_mhuv3: Add driver config: i386-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240415/202404152144.RtJxmEsQ-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-13 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240415/202404152144.RtJxmEsQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404152144.RtJxmEsQ-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv3.c: In function 'mhuv3_mbx_comb_interrupt': >> drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv3.c:922:17: error: cleanup argument not a function 922 | void *data __free(kfree) = NULL; | ^~~~ vim +922 drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv3.c 910 911 static irqreturn_t mhuv3_mbx_comb_interrupt(int irq, void *arg) 912 { 913 unsigned int i, found = 0; 914 struct mhuv3 *mhu = arg; 915 struct mbox_chan *chan; 916 struct device *dev; 917 int ret = IRQ_NONE; 918 919 dev = mhu->mbox.dev; 920 for (i = 0; i < NUM_EXT; i++) { 921 struct mhuv3_mbox_chan_priv *priv; > 922 void *data __free(kfree) = NULL; 923 924 if (!mhu->ext[i]) 925 continue; 926 927 /* Process any extension which could be source of the IRQ */ 928 chan = mhu->ext[i]->chan_from_comb_irq_get(mhu); 929 if (IS_ERR(chan)) 930 continue; 931 932 found++; 933 /* From here on we need to call rx_complete even on error */ 934 priv = chan->con_priv; 935 if (!chan->cl) { 936 dev_warn(dev, "RX Data on UNBOUND channel (%u)\n", 937 priv->ch_idx); 938 goto rx_ack; 939 } 940 941 /* Read optional in-band LE data first. */ 942 if (priv->ops->read_data) { 943 data = priv->ops->read_data(mhu, chan); 944 if (IS_ERR(data)) { 945 dev_err(dev, 946 "Failed to read in-band data. err:%ld\n", 947 PTR_ERR(no_free_ptr(data))); 948 goto rx_ack; 949 } 950 } 951 952 mbox_chan_received_data(chan, data); 953 ret = IRQ_HANDLED; 954 955 /* 956 * Acknowledge transfer after any possible optional 957 * out-of-band data has also been retrieved via 958 * mbox_chan_received_data(). 959 */ 960 rx_ack: 961 if (priv->ops->rx_complete) 962 priv->ops->rx_complete(mhu, chan); 963 } 964 965 if (found == 0) 966 dev_warn_once(dev, "Failed to find channel for the RX interrupt\n"); 967 968 return ret; 969 } 970 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki