From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: API break, sysfs "capability" file
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:38:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240417163848.GA8345@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zh_4UbT0m12EAFc3@gardel-login>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 06:26:57PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Hmm, so you want to generically allow toggling the flag from
> userspace? I mean that'd be fine with me, but it would feel a bit
> weird if you let's say have a partition block device, where you'd
> toggle this, and then you have two levels of part scanning, and then
> you toggle it on one of the part block devices there and so on, and so
> on. Could that work at all with the major/minor allocation stuff?
Oh, no - I do not want to allow toggling it on the device for
partitions. That would always fail.
> But let's say you add such a user-controlled thing, if you'd add that
> I figure you really also need a way to query the current state, right?
> which is basically what I originally was looking for...
Yes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ZhQJf8mzq_wipkBH@gardel-login>
2024-04-08 17:43 ` API break, sysfs "capability" file Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-08 18:41 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-08 20:23 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-08 22:41 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-09 6:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-09 8:19 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-09 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 15:17 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 9:26 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-17 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-16 14:18 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:22 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 14:25 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:33 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-24 8:09 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-25 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-16 14:23 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:44 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-17 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 15:48 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 15:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 16:10 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 16:26 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 16:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-04-18 6:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240417163848.GA8345@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox