* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-23 21:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-04-23 23:00 ` SeongJae Park
2024-04-23 23:32 ` Florian Fainelli
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-04-23 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, damon
Hello,
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:39:13 -0700 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.157-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 70f39a25a6b8 ("Linux 5.15.157-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-23 21:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-23 23:00 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-04-23 23:32 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-04-24 7:25 ` Pavel Machek
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-04-23 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 4/23/24 14:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.157-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-23 21:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-23 23:00 ` SeongJae Park
2024-04-23 23:32 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-04-24 7:25 ` Pavel Machek
2024-04-24 7:32 ` Pavel Machek
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-04-24 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 661 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.15.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-23 21:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-24 7:25 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-04-24 7:32 ` Pavel Machek
2024-04-24 7:57 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-04-24 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1038 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
I realise 5.10 is not released, yet, but current queue results in
problems.
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/jobs/6700369930
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c: In function 'rb_tail_page_update':
2028kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:1479:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'try_cmpxchg'; did you mean 'xa_cmpxchg'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2029 1479 | if (try_cmpxchg(&cpu_buffer->tail_page, &tail_page, next_page))
2030 | ^~~~~~~~~~~
2031 | xa_cmpxchg
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-23 21:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-24 7:32 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-04-24 7:57 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-04-24 9:21 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2024-04-24 8:28 ` Ron Economos
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-04-24 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-s390, oberpar, Alexandra Winter
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.157-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
The s390 defconfig build failed with gcc-12 and clang-17 on the Linux
stable-rc linux.5.15.y branch.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Build log:
---
drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c: In function 'qdio_int_handler':
drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c:761:52: error: incompatible type for
argument 2 of 'ccw_device_start'
761 | rc = ccw_device_start(cdev, irq_ptr->ccw,
intparm, 0, 0);
| ~~~~~~~^~~~~
| |
| struct ccw1
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/qdio.h:13,
from drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c:18:
arch/s390/include/asm/ccwdev.h:172:50: note: expected 'struct ccw1 *'
but argument is of type 'struct ccw1'
172 | extern int ccw_device_start(struct ccw_device *, struct ccw1 *,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:289: drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.o] Error 1
Suspected commit:
--------
s390/qdio: handle deferred cc1
[ Upstream commit 607638faf2ff1cede37458111496e7cc6c977f6f ]
Steps to reproduce:
---
# tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch s390 --toolchain gcc-12
--kconfig defconfig
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.156-72-g70f39a25a6b8/testrun/23638097/suite/build/test/gcc-12-defconfig/details/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2fWFs1EvyrjLKUD3D6ODW0Agksv/
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-24 7:57 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-04-24 9:21 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2024-04-27 14:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Peter Oberparleiter @ 2024-04-24 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-s390, Alexandra Winter
On 24.04.2024 09:57, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
>> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.157-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
>
> The s390 defconfig build failed with gcc-12 and clang-17 on the Linux
> stable-rc linux.5.15.y branch.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> Build log:
> ---
> drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c: In function 'qdio_int_handler':
> drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c:761:52: error: incompatible type for
> argument 2 of 'ccw_device_start'
> 761 | rc = ccw_device_start(cdev, irq_ptr->ccw,
> intparm, 0, 0);
> | ~~~~~~~^~~~~
> | |
> | struct ccw1
> In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/qdio.h:13,
> from drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c:18:
> arch/s390/include/asm/ccwdev.h:172:50: note: expected 'struct ccw1 *'
> but argument is of type 'struct ccw1'
> 172 | extern int ccw_device_start(struct ccw_device *, struct ccw1 *,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:289: drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.o] Error 1
>
>
> Suspected commit:
> --------
> s390/qdio: handle deferred cc1
> [ Upstream commit 607638faf2ff1cede37458111496e7cc6c977f6f ]
This is due to a type change of field 'ccw' in 'struct qdio_irq' that
was introduced in v5.17 via commit 718ce9e10171 ("s390/qdio: avoid
allocating the qdio_irq with GFP_DMA").
The following change to commit 607638faf2ff ("s390/qdio: handle deferred
cc1") fixes the compile error on v5.15:
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ void qdio_int_handler(struct ccw_device *cdev, unsigned long intparm,
if (rc == -EAGAIN) {
DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_INFO, irq_ptr, "qint retry");
- rc = ccw_device_start(cdev, irq_ptr->ccw, intparm, 0, 0);
+ rc = ccw_device_start(cdev, &irq_ptr->ccw, intparm, 0, 0);
if (!rc)
return;
DBF_ERROR("%4x RETRY ERR", irq_ptr->schid.sch_no);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-24 9:21 ` Peter Oberparleiter
@ 2024-04-27 14:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-04-27 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Oberparleiter
Cc: Naresh Kamboju, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-s390, Alexandra Winter
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> On 24.04.2024 09:57, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
> >> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >> let me know.
> >>
> >> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> >> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>
> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.157-rc1.gz
> >> or in the git tree and branch at:
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> >> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> greg k-h
> >
> >
> > The s390 defconfig build failed with gcc-12 and clang-17 on the Linux
> > stable-rc linux.5.15.y branch.
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> > Build log:
> > ---
> > drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c: In function 'qdio_int_handler':
> > drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c:761:52: error: incompatible type for
> > argument 2 of 'ccw_device_start'
> > 761 | rc = ccw_device_start(cdev, irq_ptr->ccw,
> > intparm, 0, 0);
> > | ~~~~~~~^~~~~
> > | |
> > | struct ccw1
> > In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/qdio.h:13,
> > from drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c:18:
> > arch/s390/include/asm/ccwdev.h:172:50: note: expected 'struct ccw1 *'
> > but argument is of type 'struct ccw1'
> > 172 | extern int ccw_device_start(struct ccw_device *, struct ccw1 *,
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:289: drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.o] Error 1
> >
> >
> > Suspected commit:
> > --------
> > s390/qdio: handle deferred cc1
> > [ Upstream commit 607638faf2ff1cede37458111496e7cc6c977f6f ]
>
> This is due to a type change of field 'ccw' in 'struct qdio_irq' that
> was introduced in v5.17 via commit 718ce9e10171 ("s390/qdio: avoid
> allocating the qdio_irq with GFP_DMA").
>
> The following change to commit 607638faf2ff ("s390/qdio: handle deferred
> cc1") fixes the compile error on v5.15:
>
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/qdio_main.c
> @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ void qdio_int_handler(struct ccw_device *cdev, unsigned long intparm,
>
> if (rc == -EAGAIN) {
> DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_INFO, irq_ptr, "qint retry");
> - rc = ccw_device_start(cdev, irq_ptr->ccw, intparm, 0, 0);
> + rc = ccw_device_start(cdev, &irq_ptr->ccw, intparm, 0, 0);
> if (!rc)
> return;
> DBF_ERROR("%4x RETRY ERR", irq_ptr->schid.sch_no);
>
>
Fix now made, thanks for this!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-23 21:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-24 7:57 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-04-24 8:28 ` Ron Economos
2024-04-24 9:30 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-04-24 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 4/23/24 2:39 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.157-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-23 21:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-24 8:28 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-04-24 9:30 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-04-25 8:59 ` Jon Hunter
2024-04-25 20:19 ` Shreeya Patel
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2024-04-24 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hi Greg,
On 24/04/24 03:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.157-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-23 21:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-24 9:30 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2024-04-25 8:59 ` Jon Hunter
2024-04-25 20:19 ` Shreeya Patel
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-04-25 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:39:13 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.157-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
102 tests: 102 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.157-rc1-g70f39a25a6b8
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review
2024-04-23 21:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/71] 5.15.157-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-25 8:59 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-04-25 20:19 ` Shreeya Patel
8 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shreeya Patel @ 2024-04-25 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
Gustavo Padovan, kernelci-regressions mailing list
On Wednesday, April 24, 2024 03:09 IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.157 release.
> There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.157-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
KernelCI report for stable-rc/linux-5.15.y for this week.
## stable-rc HEAD for linux-5.15.y:
Date: 2024-04-23
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/log/?h=70f39a25a6b86d04f5693eac9b6f203ed23d8260
## Build failures:
No build failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-5.15.y commit head \o/
## Boot failures:
No **new** boot failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-5.15.y commit head \o/
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
Shreeya Patel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread