From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
To: wintera@linux.ibm.com, twinkler@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com
Cc: borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
guwen@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v7 04/11] net/smc: implement DMB-related operations of loopback-ism
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 14:07:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240428060738.60843-5-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240428060738.60843-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
This implements DMB (un)registration and data move operations of
loopback-ism device.
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Jan Karcher <jaka@linux.ibm.com>
---
net/smc/smc_loopback.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/smc/smc_loopback.h | 13 +++++
2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
index 0349632a76c4..d75852549b00 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
@@ -15,10 +15,12 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <net/smc.h>
+#include "smc_cdc.h"
#include "smc_ism.h"
#include "smc_loopback.h"
#define SMC_LO_V2_CAPABLE 0x1 /* loopback-ism acts as ISMv2 */
+#define SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID (~(dma_addr_t)0)
static const char smc_lo_dev_name[] = "loopback-ism";
static struct smc_lo_dev *lo_dev;
@@ -48,6 +50,125 @@ static int smc_lo_query_rgid(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_gid *rgid,
return 0;
}
+static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb,
+ void *client_priv)
+{
+ struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node, *tmp_node;
+ struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+ int sba_idx, rc;
+
+ /* check space for new dmb */
+ for_each_clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask, SMC_LO_MAX_DMBS) {
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask))
+ break;
+ }
+ if (sba_idx == SMC_LO_MAX_DMBS)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ dmb_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*dmb_node), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dmb_node) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_bit;
+ }
+
+ dmb_node->sba_idx = sba_idx;
+ dmb_node->len = dmb->dmb_len;
+ dmb_node->cpu_addr = kzalloc(dmb_node->len, GFP_KERNEL |
+ __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY |
+ __GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
+ if (!dmb_node->cpu_addr) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_node;
+ }
+ dmb_node->dma_addr = SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
+
+again:
+ /* add new dmb into hash table */
+ get_random_bytes(&dmb_node->token, sizeof(dmb_node->token));
+ write_lock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_node->token) {
+ if (tmp_node->token == dmb_node->token) {
+ write_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ goto again;
+ }
+ }
+ hash_add(ldev->dmb_ht, &dmb_node->list, dmb_node->token);
+ write_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+ dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx;
+ dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token;
+ dmb->cpu_addr = dmb_node->cpu_addr;
+ dmb->dma_addr = dmb_node->dma_addr;
+ dmb->dmb_len = dmb_node->len;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_node:
+ kfree(dmb_node);
+err_bit:
+ clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask);
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
+{
+ struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
+ struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+
+ /* remove dmb from hash table */
+ write_lock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) {
+ if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) {
+ dmb_node = tmp_node;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!dmb_node) {
+ write_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ hash_del(&dmb_node->list);
+ write_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+ clear_bit(dmb_node->sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask);
+ kfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr);
+ kfree(dmb_node);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int smc_lo_move_data(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 dmb_tok,
+ unsigned int idx, bool sf, unsigned int offset,
+ void *data, unsigned int size)
+{
+ struct smc_lo_dmb_node *rmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
+ struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+ struct smc_connection *conn;
+
+ read_lock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_tok) {
+ if (tmp_node->token == dmb_tok) {
+ rmb_node = tmp_node;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!rmb_node) {
+ read_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ memcpy((char *)rmb_node->cpu_addr + offset, data, size);
+ read_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+ if (sf) {
+ conn = smcd->conn[rmb_node->sba_idx];
+ if (conn && !conn->killed)
+ tasklet_schedule(&conn->rx_tsklet);
+ else
+ return -EPIPE;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int smc_lo_supports_v2(void)
{
return SMC_LO_V2_CAPABLE;
@@ -74,14 +195,14 @@ static struct device *smc_lo_get_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
static const struct smcd_ops lo_ops = {
.query_remote_gid = smc_lo_query_rgid,
- .register_dmb = NULL,
- .unregister_dmb = NULL,
+ .register_dmb = smc_lo_register_dmb,
+ .unregister_dmb = smc_lo_unregister_dmb,
.add_vlan_id = NULL,
.del_vlan_id = NULL,
.set_vlan_required = NULL,
.reset_vlan_required = NULL,
.signal_event = NULL,
- .move_data = NULL,
+ .move_data = smc_lo_move_data,
.supports_v2 = smc_lo_supports_v2,
.get_local_gid = smc_lo_get_local_gid,
.get_chid = smc_lo_get_chid,
@@ -146,6 +267,8 @@ static void smcd_lo_unregister_dev(struct smc_lo_dev *ldev)
static int smc_lo_dev_init(struct smc_lo_dev *ldev)
{
smc_lo_generate_ids(ldev);
+ rwlock_init(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ hash_init(ldev->dmb_ht);
return smcd_lo_register_dev(ldev);
}
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
index d7df79f7bb64..b8206338309f 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
@@ -20,13 +20,26 @@
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_LO)
#define SMC_LO_MAX_DMBS 5000
+#define SMC_LO_DMBS_HASH_BITS 12
#define SMC_LO_RESERVED_CHID 0xFFFF
+struct smc_lo_dmb_node {
+ struct hlist_node list;
+ u64 token;
+ u32 len;
+ u32 sba_idx;
+ void *cpu_addr;
+ dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+};
+
struct smc_lo_dev {
struct smcd_dev *smcd;
struct device dev;
u16 chid;
struct smcd_gid local_gid;
+ rwlock_t dmb_ht_lock;
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(sba_idx_mask, SMC_LO_MAX_DMBS);
+ DECLARE_HASHTABLE(dmb_ht, SMC_LO_DMBS_HASH_BITS);
};
int smc_loopback_init(void);
--
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-28 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-28 6:07 [PATCH net-next v7 00/11] net/smc: SMC intra-OS shortcut with loopback-ism Wen Gu
2024-04-28 6:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 01/11] net/smc: decouple ism_client from SMC-D DMB registration Wen Gu
2024-04-28 6:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 02/11] net/smc: introduce loopback-ism for SMC intra-OS shortcut Wen Gu
2024-04-28 6:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 03/11] net/smc: implement ID-related operations of loopback-ism Wen Gu
2024-04-28 6:07 ` Wen Gu [this message]
2024-04-28 6:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 05/11] net/smc: mark optional smcd_ops and check for support when called Wen Gu
2024-04-28 6:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 06/11] net/smc: ignore loopback-ism when dumping SMC-D devices Wen Gu
2024-04-28 6:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 07/11] net/smc: register loopback-ism into SMC-D device list Wen Gu
2024-04-28 6:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 08/11] net/smc: add operations to merge sndbuf with peer DMB Wen Gu
2024-04-28 6:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 09/11] net/smc: {at|de}tach sndbuf to peer DMB if supported Wen Gu
2024-04-28 6:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 10/11] net/smc: adapt cursor update when sndbuf and peer DMB are merged Wen Gu
2024-04-28 6:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 11/11] net/smc: implement DMB-merged operations of loopback-ism Wen Gu
2024-04-28 15:49 ` [PATCH net-next v7 00/11] net/smc: SMC intra-OS shortcut with loopback-ism Cong Wang
2024-05-07 14:34 ` Wen Gu
2024-05-07 16:10 ` Cong Wang
2024-05-08 3:48 ` Wen Gu
2024-05-08 6:39 ` Tony Lu
2024-04-30 11:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240428060738.60843-5-guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox