Re: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/141] 6.1.88-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 03:32:55PM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> Greg,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:53:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.88 release.
> > > There are 141 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.88-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > As Pavel reported,
> > 
> > LKFT also found these regressions on 6.1.
> > 
> > The arm build failed with gcc-13 and clang-17 on the Linux stable-rc
> > linux.6.1.y branch.
> > 
> > arm:
> >  * omap2plus_defconfig - failed
> >  * defconfig  - failed
> > 
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> 
> I'm curious why v6.1.88 is still released nevertheless the reports of the
> build regression on ARM32.

Because I missed this, I thought I had dropped it already, sorry about
that.  I'll go do a new release with this commit reverted.

thanks,

greg k-h