* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review
2024-04-30 10:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-04-30 16:31 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-04-30 16:47 ` SeongJae Park
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2024-04-30 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hi Greg,
On 30/04/24 16:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.158 release.
> There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.158-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> ----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review
2024-04-30 10:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-30 16:31 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2024-04-30 16:47 ` SeongJae Park
2024-04-30 18:49 ` Florian Fainelli
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-04-30 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, damon
Hello,
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:39:32 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.158 release.
> There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.158-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] d6b90d569cec ("Linux 5.15.158-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review
2024-04-30 10:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-30 16:31 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-04-30 16:47 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-04-30 18:49 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-01 8:52 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-04-30 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 4/30/24 03:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.158 release.
> There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.158-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review
2024-04-30 10:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-30 18:49 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-05-01 8:52 ` Ron Economos
2024-05-01 10:30 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-05-01 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 4/30/24 3:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.158 release.
> There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.158-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review
2024-04-30 10:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-01 8:52 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-05-01 10:30 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-05-01 13:38 ` Jon Hunter
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-05-01 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.158 release.
> There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.158-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.158-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: d6b90d569cec2513e2bd695321ba651a37d4267f
* git describe: v5.15.157-81-gd6b90d569cec
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.157-81-gd6b90d569cec
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.155)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.155)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.155)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.155)
## Test result summary
total: 91343, pass: 73626, fail: 2525, skip: 15124, xfail: 68
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 103 total, 103 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review
2024-04-30 10:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-01 10:30 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-05-01 13:38 ` Jon Hunter
2024-05-02 3:05 ` Shuah Khan
2024-05-02 6:38 ` Pascal Ernster
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-05-01 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:39:32 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.158 release.
> There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.158-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
102 tests: 102 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.158-rc1-gd6b90d569cec
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review
2024-04-30 10:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-01 13:38 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-05-02 3:05 ` Shuah Khan
2024-05-02 6:38 ` Pascal Ernster
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-05-02 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 4/30/24 04:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.158 release.
> There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.158-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review
2024-04-30 10:39 [PATCH 5.15 00/80] 5.15.158-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-02 3:05 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-05-02 6:38 ` Pascal Ernster
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pascal Ernster @ 2024-05-02 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[2024-04-30 12:39] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.158 release.
> There are 80 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 May 2024 10:30:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi, 5.15.158-rc1 is running fine on a Netgear GS108T v3 (the SoC is a
Realtek RTL8380M, which has a MIPS 4KEc core).
Note that I have *not* tested building the kernel documentation, and I
suspect that building the documentation with docutils >= 0.21 would
likely fail without the patch from
https://lore.kernel.org/all/faf5fa45-2a9d-4573-9d2e-3930bdc1ed65@gmail.com/
Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@hardfalcon.net>
Regards
Pascal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread