From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] checkpatch: add check for snprintf to scnprintf
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 10:30:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240502093019.GH5338@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240429-snprintf-checkpatch-v6-1-354c62c88290@google.com>
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Justin Stitt wrote:
> I am going to quote Lee Jones who has been doing some snprintf ->
> scnprintf refactorings:
>
> "There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that
> {v}snprintf() returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the
> destination array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf()
> really returns the length of the data that *would have been* written if
> there were enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to
> buffer-overruns in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the
> {v}scnprintf() variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple
> cases). So let's do that."
>
> To help prevent new instances of snprintf() from popping up, let's add a
> check to checkpatch.pl.
>
> Suggested-by: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - move capture group to only include symbol name (not spaces or paren)
> - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240422-snprintf-checkpatch-v5-1-f1e90bf7164e@google.com
>
> Changes in v5:
> - use capture groups to let the user know which variation they used
> - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408-snprintf-checkpatch-v4-1-8697c96ac94b@google.com
>
> Changes in v4:
> - also check for vsnprintf variant (thanks Bill)
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240315-snprintf-checkpatch-v3-1-a451e7664306@google.com
>
> Changes in v3:
> - fix indentation
> - add reference link (https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105) (thanks Joe)
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221-snprintf-checkpatch-v2-1-9baeb59dae30@google.com
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Had a vim moment and deleted a character before sending the patch.
> - Replaced the character :)
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221-snprintf-checkpatch-v1-1-3ac5025b5961@google.com
> ---
> From a discussion here [1].
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0f9c95f9-2c14-eee6-7faf-635880edcea4@linux-m68k.org/
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-02 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 18:39 [PATCH v6] checkpatch: add check for snprintf to scnprintf Justin Stitt
2024-04-29 19:49 ` Kees Cook
2024-04-30 3:21 ` Joe Perches
2024-05-02 9:29 ` Lee Jones
2024-05-02 22:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-02 9:30 ` Lee Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240502093019.GH5338@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
--cc=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox