From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 669F218C36; Sun, 5 May 2024 13:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714914589; cv=none; b=iz5fEvSiFly5GzszwxJeG6r2zUwIY6zFQFSpEn8QgKONtQtGpYtC1bfU84uGch0VRupZ61/VUa4+akLFrINB016ejwK/Axb7qDrZSdyKje+8YOxW3DhpgshB4xqRls3D13yusYk+7kU/PbdmWLJhrBRgUul4+zlvwWfLW91QX38= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714914589; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xlRUYoJPou2/MPpAB5hzWLpalR+ZAUvBv9HmZG5I9+k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=e5h9egQu9yFIYyQulPXPhgYqqjFbJjlEzpkHcE+8TiMgFxlnENQKN02y+QIIipEVsvYRDMfR3vhY6VIxpVYeHvYxByb/L6GIb+crRDHtkQqxSSeIBvp4hrhDozEAYYAlAoeHbvHM0yFekATz4uPN/XPK91BdZnGKuI6Pjpf3CaQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=DyFIsDIc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="DyFIsDIc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E851C113CC; Sun, 5 May 2024 13:09:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1714914588; bh=xlRUYoJPou2/MPpAB5hzWLpalR+ZAUvBv9HmZG5I9+k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DyFIsDIcBCXPdf5m999VIskZIZ3Ju5s8JfJ7pbM8DKPrNCCZI9ot8LqlAFcA7zGeH xEfZUHP+pTYlQEqLs5pArOYOcT/l+a+8A+7Li6FYOIOb0T0Q92zUCdc02p38J1kKkN fGz+U2FNMt6C6ocJrCG3jWrFuT2kSuaQOuVPdsE/3Xt5+iiIhD2KTKWkyHVbirLHfh 32cMVlj5dqsjTbb6WCnYlM6luqPotng5VtG5kZVmmJPSVMiRB1wsc8tj4jsVypNjmR 0qe5FzwC3I1L1tkbGk2SvbABZQgkwvc244O3J4xGB0zePEAC4wEw7a2mGw3vkLSbks 1+K3E3asdqGhg== Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 16:09:45 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , Alex Deucher , amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Dennis Dalessandro , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, LKML , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, "Pan, Xinhui" , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Lukas Wunner , Dean Luick Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] RDMA/hfi1: Use RMW accessors for changing LNKCTL2 Message-ID: <20240505130945.GB68202@unreal> References: <20240215133155.9198-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> <20240215133155.9198-4-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> <26be3948-e687-f510-0612-abcac5d919af@linux.intel.com> <20240503130416.GA901876@ziepe.ca> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240503130416.GA901876@ziepe.ca> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 10:04:16AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 01:18:35PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > > > > Convert open coded RMW accesses for LNKCTL2 to use > > > pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word() which makes its easier to > > > understand what the code tries to do. > > > > > > LNKCTL2 is not really owned by any driver because it is a collection of > > > control bits that PCI core might need to touch. RMW accessors already > > > have support for proper locking for a selected set of registers > > > (LNKCTL2 is not yet among them but likely will be in the future) to > > > avoid losing concurrent updates. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner > > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen > > > Reviewed-by: Dean Luick > > > > I found out from Linux RDMA and InfiniBand patchwork that this patch had > > been silently closed as "Not Applicable". Is there some reason for > > that? > > It is part of a series that crosses subsystems, series like that > usually go through some other trees. Exactly, this is why I marked it as "Not Applicable". > > If you want single patches applied then please send single > patches.. It is hard to understand intent from mixed series. > > Jason