public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	 Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 6/8] bpf: remove one special case of is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc
Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 15:19:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240507-bpf_async-v1-6-b4df966096d8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507-bpf_async-v1-0-b4df966096d8@kernel.org>

It looks like the generic implementation based on __s_async suffix works
well enough. So let's use it.

Note:
- currently we lose the return value range
- the second argument is not of type PTR_TO_MAP_KEY

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>

---

This is an RFC, and is not meant to be fully reviewed/applied as it is.
I'm posting this to show what I wanted to explain in
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/mhkzkf4e23uvljtmwizwcxyuyat2tmfxn33xb4t7waafgmsa66@mcrzpj3b6ssx/
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 27 ++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index cc4dab81b306..6fba9e2caa83 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -511,7 +511,6 @@ static bool is_dynptr_ref_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
 }
 
 static bool is_sync_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
-static bool is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
 static bool is_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
 static bool is_bpf_throw_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn);
 
@@ -544,8 +543,7 @@ static bool is_sync_callback_calling_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn)
 
 static bool is_async_callback_calling_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
-	return (bpf_helper_call(insn) && is_async_callback_calling_function(insn->imm)) ||
-	       (bpf_pseudo_kfunc_call(insn) && is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(insn->imm));
+	return bpf_helper_call(insn) && is_async_callback_calling_function(insn->imm);
 }
 
 static bool is_may_goto_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn)
@@ -9560,15 +9558,14 @@ static int push_callback_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *ins
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
-	if (is_async_callback_calling_insn(insn) || (kfunc_meta && kfunc_meta->async_cb.enabled)) {
+	if (kfunc_meta && kfunc_meta->async_cb.enabled) {
 		struct bpf_verifier_state *async_cb;
 
 		/* there is no real recursion here. timer and workqueue callbacks are async */
 		env->subprog_info[subprog].is_async_cb = true;
 		async_cb = push_async_cb(env, env->subprog_info[subprog].start,
 					 insn_idx, subprog,
-					 (is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(insn->imm) ||
-					  (kfunc_meta && kfunc_meta->async_cb.sleepable)));
+					 kfunc_meta && kfunc_meta->async_cb.sleepable);
 		if (!async_cb)
 			return -EFAULT;
 		callee = async_cb->frame[0];
@@ -11534,11 +11531,6 @@ static bool is_sync_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
 	return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl];
 }
 
-static bool is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
-{
-	return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl];
-}
-
 static bool is_bpf_throw_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
 	return bpf_pseudo_kfunc_call(insn) && insn->off == 0 &&
@@ -11552,8 +11544,7 @@ static bool is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
 
 static bool is_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
 {
-	return is_sync_callback_calling_kfunc(btf_id) ||
-	       is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(btf_id);
+	return is_sync_callback_calling_kfunc(btf_id);
 }
 
 static bool is_rbtree_lock_required_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
@@ -12465,16 +12456,6 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(meta.func_id)) {
-		err = push_callback_call(env, insn, insn_idx, meta.subprogno,
-					 set_timer_callback_state, &meta);
-		if (err) {
-			verbose(env, "kfunc %s#%d failed callback verification\n",
-				func_name, meta.func_id);
-			return err;
-		}
-	}
-
 	if (meta.async_cb.enabled) {
 		err = push_callback_call(env, insn, insn_idx, meta.subprogno,
 					 set_generic_callback_state, &meta);

-- 
2.44.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-07 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-07 13:19 [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/8] Implement generic bpf_async cb Benjamin Tissoires
2024-05-07 13:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/8] bpf: ignore sleepable prog parameter for kfuncs Benjamin Tissoires
2024-05-07 13:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 2/8] bpf: add kfunc_meta parameter to push_callback_call() Benjamin Tissoires
2024-05-07 13:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 3/8] bpf: implement __async and __s_async kfunc suffixes Benjamin Tissoires
2024-05-07 13:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 4/8] bpf: typedef a type for the bpf_wq callbacks Benjamin Tissoires
2024-05-07 13:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 5/8] selftests/bpf: rely on wq_callback_fn_t Benjamin Tissoires
2024-05-07 13:19 ` Benjamin Tissoires [this message]
2024-05-07 13:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 7/8] bpf: implement __aux kfunc argument suffix to fetch prog_aux Benjamin Tissoires
2024-05-07 13:19 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 8/8] bpf: rely on __aux suffix for bpf_wq_set_callback_impl Benjamin Tissoires

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240507-bpf_async-v1-6-b4df966096d8@kernel.org \
    --to=bentiss@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox