From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] KVM: x86/pmu: Add kvm_pmu_call() to simplify static calls of kvm_pmu_ops
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 21:31:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240507133103.15052-4-wei.w.wang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507133103.15052-1-wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Similar to kvm_x86_call(), kvm_pmu_call() is added to streamline the usage
of static calls of kvm_pmu_ops, which improves code readability.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 44d19eb5a27a..7088a5d189a7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1853,6 +1853,7 @@ extern bool __read_mostly enable_apicv;
extern struct kvm_x86_ops kvm_x86_ops;
#define kvm_x86_call(func) static_call(kvm_x86_##func)
+#define kvm_pmu_call(func) static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_##func)
#define KVM_X86_OP(func) \
DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(kvm_x86_##func, *(((struct kvm_x86_ops *)0)->func));
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 68b5826328b1..ed42d4eedb7f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_check_rdpmc_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx)
if (!kvm_pmu_ops.check_rdpmc_early)
return 0;
- return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_check_rdpmc_early)(vcpu, idx);
+ return kvm_pmu_call(check_rdpmc_early)(vcpu, idx);
}
bool is_vmware_backdoor_pmc(u32 pmc_idx)
@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx, u64 *data)
if (is_vmware_backdoor_pmc(idx))
return kvm_pmu_rdpmc_vmware(vcpu, idx, data);
- pmc = static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc)(vcpu, idx, &mask);
+ pmc = kvm_pmu_call(rdpmc_ecx_to_pmc)(vcpu, idx, &mask);
if (!pmc)
return 1;
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned idx, u64 *data)
void kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu)) {
- static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_deliver_pmi)(vcpu);
+ kvm_pmu_call(deliver_pmi)(vcpu);
kvm_apic_local_deliver(vcpu->arch.apic, APIC_LVTPC);
}
}
@@ -622,14 +622,14 @@ bool kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
default:
break;
}
- return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_msr_idx_to_pmc)(vcpu, msr) ||
- static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_is_valid_msr)(vcpu, msr);
+ return kvm_pmu_call(msr_idx_to_pmc)(vcpu, msr) ||
+ kvm_pmu_call(is_valid_msr)(vcpu, msr);
}
static void kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
- struct kvm_pmc *pmc = static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_msr_idx_to_pmc)(vcpu, msr);
+ struct kvm_pmc *pmc = kvm_pmu_call(msr_idx_to_pmc)(vcpu, msr);
if (pmc)
__set_bit(pmc->idx, pmu->pmc_in_use);
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
msr_info->data = 0;
break;
default:
- return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_get_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
+ return kvm_pmu_call(get_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
}
return 0;
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
break;
default:
kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(vcpu, msr_info->index);
- return static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_set_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
+ return kvm_pmu_call(set_msr)(vcpu, msr_info);
}
return 0;
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static void kvm_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl = pmu->global_ctrl = pmu->global_status = 0;
- static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_reset)(vcpu);
+ kvm_pmu_call(reset)(vcpu);
}
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.enable_pmu)
return;
- static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_refresh)(vcpu);
+ kvm_pmu_call(refresh)(vcpu);
/*
* At RESET, both Intel and AMD CPUs set all enable bits for general
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
memset(pmu, 0, sizeof(*pmu));
- static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_init)(vcpu);
+ kvm_pmu_call(init)(vcpu);
kvm_pmu_refresh(vcpu);
}
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
pmc_stop_counter(pmc);
}
- static_call(kvm_x86_pmu_cleanup)(vcpu);
+ kvm_pmu_call(cleanup)(vcpu);
bitmap_zero(pmu->pmc_in_use, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
}
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-07 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-07 13:31 [PATCH v4 0/3] KVM/x86: Enhancements to static calls Wei Wang
2024-05-07 13:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: x86: Replace static_call_cond() with static_call() Wei Wang
2024-05-07 13:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] KVM: x86: Introduce kvm_x86_call() to simplify static calls of kvm_x86_ops Wei Wang
2024-05-07 13:31 ` Wei Wang [this message]
2024-06-12 1:18 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] KVM/x86: Enhancements to static calls Sean Christopherson
2024-06-12 1:55 ` Wang, Wei W
2024-06-12 10:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-06-18 14:37 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240507133103.15052-4-wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox