public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] configfs_{un,}register_group() semantics
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 05:35:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240512043509.GH2118490@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240512043012.GG2118490@ZenIV>

[now with hopefully correct address of Daniel Baluta]

On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 05:30:12AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> 	Folks, could you confirm if the following is correct?
> 
> 1. configfs_unregister_group() callers are supposed to prevent
> having it called when some items/groups had been created under it.
> The original one (in iio) *does* prevent that (the call chains come
> through the module_exit() of modules pinned by ->make_group() for
> the added subdirectory), but I don't see that documented anywhere and
> AFAICS at least in one case (drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c) that is
> not guaranteed.  The same goes for symlinks created in or to those.
> 
> 2. rmdir on directory added by configfs_register_group() is supposed to
> fail (is it even supposed to be used inside the stuff created by mkdir?
> Original use was inside a subsystem, AFAICS).
> 
> 3. rmdir that would've taken out the parent group is supposed to take
> the added one out (again, are they even supposed to be used inside the
> stuff created by mkdir?)
> 
> 4. one is *NOT* supposed to use have ->make_group() schedule creation of
> subdirectories via configfs_register_group(); configfs_add_default_group()
> ought to be used instead.
> 
> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-ep-cfs.c:pci_epf_make() has this:
>         INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&epf_group->cfs_work, pci_epf_cfs_work);
>         queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &epf_group->cfs_work,
>                            msecs_to_jiffies(1));
> 
>         return &epf_group->group;
> 
> with pci_epf_cfs_work() allocating several config_group and calling
> configfs_register_group() to link those in.  I really doubt that this
> kind of "let's hope that configfs_mkdir() will get through directory
> creation in less than 1ms after ->make_group() returns" is the way it
> is supposed to be done; at a guess, configfs_add_default_group()
> should've been used (synchronously), but I might be missing something
> subtle here.
> 
> Comments?
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-12  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-12  4:30 [RFC] configfs_{un,}register_group() semantics Al Viro
2024-05-12  4:35 ` Al Viro [this message]
2024-05-15 19:07   ` Joel Becker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240512043509.GH2118490@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox