From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: Don't reduce symlink i_mode by umask if no ACL support
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 09:38:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240512073812.fkrbriddfvfj3igp@quack3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1586868.1715341641@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Fri 10-05-24 12:47:21, David Howells wrote:
>
> If CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=n then the fallback version of ext4_init_acl()
> will mask off the umask bits from the new inode's i_mode. This should not
> be done if the inode is a symlink. If CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y, then we
> go through posix_acl_create() instead which does the right thing with
> symlinks.
>
> However, this is actually unnecessary now as vfs_prepare_mode() has already
> done this where appropriate, so fix this by making the fallback version of
> ext4_init_acl() do nothing.
>
> Fixes: 484fd6c1de13 ("ext4: apply umask if ACL support is disabled")
> Suggested-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
> cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/acl.h | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/acl.h b/fs/ext4/acl.h
> index ef4c19e5f570..0c5a79c3b5d4 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/acl.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/acl.h
> @@ -68,11 +68,6 @@ extern int ext4_init_acl(handle_t *, struct inode *, struct inode *);
> static inline int
> ext4_init_acl(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir)
> {
> - /* usually, the umask is applied by posix_acl_create(), but if
> - ext4 ACL support is disabled at compile time, we need to do
> - it here, because posix_acl_create() will never be called */
> - inode->i_mode &= ~current_umask();
> -
> return 0;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL */
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-13 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-10 11:47 [PATCH v3] ext4: Don't reduce symlink i_mode by umask if no ACL support David Howells
2024-05-12 7:38 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2024-05-15 16:49 ` Christian Brauner
2024-05-17 15:10 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240512073812.fkrbriddfvfj3igp@quack3 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max.kellermann@ionos.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox