public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] rcu/exp: Remove redundant full memory barrier at the end of GP
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 14:53:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240515125332.9306-7-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240515125332.9306-1-frederic@kernel.org>

A full memory barrier is necessary at the end of the expedited grace
period to order:

1) The grace period completion (pictured by the GP sequence
   number) with all preceding accesses. This pairs with rcu_seq_end()
   performed by the concurrent kworker.

2) The grace period completion and subsequent post-GP update side
   accesses. Pairs again against rcu_seq_end().

This full barrier is already provided by the final sync_exp_work_done()
test, making the subsequent explicit one redundant. Remove it and
improve comments.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index bec24ea6777e..721cb93b1fec 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -265,7 +265,12 @@ static bool sync_exp_work_done(unsigned long s)
 {
 	if (rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(s)) {
 		trace_rcu_exp_grace_period(rcu_state.name, s, TPS("done"));
-		smp_mb(); /* Ensure test happens before caller kfree(). */
+		/*
+		 * Order GP completion with preceding accesses. Order also GP
+		 * completion with post GP update side accesses. Pairs with
+		 * rcu_seq_end().
+		 */
+		smp_mb();
 		return true;
 	}
 	return false;
@@ -959,7 +964,6 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 	rnp = rcu_get_root();
 	wait_event(rnp->exp_wq[rcu_seq_ctr(s) & 0x3],
 		   sync_exp_work_done(s));
-	smp_mb(); /* Work actions happen before return. */
 
 	/* Let the next expedited grace period start. */
 	mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.exp_mutex);
-- 
2.44.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-15 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-15 12:53 [PATCH 0/6] rcu: Remove several redundant memory barriers Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/6] rcu: Remove full ordering on second EQS snapshot Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 17:32   ` Valentin Schneider
2024-05-15 12:53 ` [PATCH 2/6] rcu: Remove superfluous full memory barrier upon first " Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16 15:31   ` Valentin Schneider
2024-05-16 16:08     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16 17:08       ` Valentin Schneider
2024-05-17  7:29         ` Andrea Parri
2024-05-17 11:40           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-17 16:27             ` Andrea Parri
2024-05-15 12:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] rcu/exp: " Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 12:53 ` [PATCH 4/6] rcu: Remove full memory barrier on boot time eqs sanity check Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16 17:09   ` Valentin Schneider
2024-05-15 12:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] rcu: Remove full memory barrier on RCU stall printout Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16 17:09   ` Valentin Schneider
2024-06-04  0:10   ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-04 11:13     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-04 14:00       ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-15 12:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-05-15 17:32 ` [PATCH 0/6] rcu: Remove several redundant memory barriers Valentin Schneider
2024-05-15 23:13   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240515125332.9306-7-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox