From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: sched/isolation: tick_take_do_timer_from_boot() calls smp_call_function_single() with irqs disabled
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 17:17:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240522151742.GA10400@redhat.com> (raw)
After the recent comment 5097cbcb38e6 ("sched/isolation: Prevent boot crash
when the boot CPU is nohz_full") the kernel no longer crashes, but there is
another problem.
In this case tick_setup_device() does tick_take_do_timer_from_boot() to
update tick_do_timer_cpu and this triggers WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled())
in smp_call_function_single().
I don't understand this code even remotely, I failed to find the fix.
Perhaps we can use smp_call_function_single_async() as a workaround ?
But I don't even understand why exactly we need smp_call_function()...
Lets suppose we change
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -231,9 +231,9 @@ static void tick_setup_device(struct tick_device *td,
} else if (tick_do_timer_boot_cpu != -1 &&
!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu)) {
- tick_take_do_timer_from_boot();
+// tick_take_do_timer_from_boot();
tick_do_timer_boot_cpu = -1;
- WARN_ON(READ_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu) != cpu);
+ WRITE_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu), cpu);
#endif
}
Can anyone explain what exactly can go wrong?
Race with tick_nohz_stop_tick() on boot CPU which can set
tick_do_timer_cpu = TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE? Is it really bad?
Something else?
Please help, I don't think I can find a sane solution :/
Oleg.
next reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-22 15:17 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-05-23 13:23 ` sched/isolation: tick_take_do_timer_from_boot() calls smp_call_function_single() with irqs disabled Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-24 9:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-24 14:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-24 15:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-24 15:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-24 17:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-24 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-24 22:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-25 13:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-25 14:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-26 19:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-26 20:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-27 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-27 11:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-27 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-28 1:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-28 12:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-27 16:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-26 20:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-27 9:10 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-27 10:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-27 11:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-28 12:20 ` [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: don't abuse smp_call_function_single() in tick_setup_device() Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-28 12:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-30 12:40 ` [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: turn tick_do_timer_boot_cpu into boot_cpu_is_nohz_full Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-03 15:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-03 21:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-04 5:08 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: don't abuse smp_call_function_single() in tick_setup_device() Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 16:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-30 17:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-01 14:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-02 21:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-03 15:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-03 21:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-10 15:55 ` [PING ;)] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 18:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-06-10 18:26 ` [tip: timers/urgent] tick/nohz_full: Don't " tip-bot2 for Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 19:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240522151742.GA10400@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=crecklin@redhat.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox