Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: multipath: Implemented new iopolicy "queue-depth"

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>]

> +	/*
> +	 * queue-depth iopolicy does not need to reference ->current_path
> +	 * but round-robin needs the last path used to advance to the
> +	 * next one, and numa will continue to use the last path unless
> +	 * it is or has become not optimized
> +	 */

Can we please turn this into a full sentence?  I.e.:

	/*
	 * The queue-depth iopolicy does not need to reference ->current_path,
	 * but the round-robin iopolicy needs the last path used to advance to
	 * the next one, and numa will continue to use the last path unless
	 * it is or has become non-optimized.
	 */

?

> +	if (iopolicy == NVME_IOPOLICY_QD)
> +		return nvme_queue_depth_path(head);
> +
> +	node = numa_node_id();
>  	ns = srcu_dereference(head->current_path[node], &head->srcu);
>  	if (unlikely(!ns))
>  		return __nvme_find_path(head, node);
>  
> -	if (READ_ONCE(head->subsys->iopolicy) == NVME_IOPOLICY_RR)
> +	if (iopolicy == NVME_IOPOLICY_RR)
>  		return nvme_round_robin_path(head, node, ns);
> +
>  	if (unlikely(!nvme_path_is_optimized(ns)))
>  		return __nvme_find_path(head, node);
>  	return ns;

Also this is growing into the kind of spaghetti code that is on the fast
path to become unmaintainable.  I'd much rather see the
srcu_dereference + __nvme_find_path duplicated and have a switch over
the iopolicies with a separate helper for each of them here than the
various ifs at different levels.

> +static void nvme_subsys_iopolicy_update(struct nvme_subsystem *subsys, int iopolicy)

Overly long line here.

> +{
> +	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl;
> +	int old_iopolicy = READ_ONCE(subsys->iopolicy);
> +
> +	if (old_iopolicy == iopolicy)
> +		return;
> +
> +	WRITE_ONCE(subsys->iopolicy, iopolicy);
> +
> +	/* iopolicy changes reset the counters and clear the mpath by design */
> +	mutex_lock(&nvme_subsystems_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(ctrl, &subsys->ctrls, subsys_entry) {
> +		atomic_set(&ctrl->nr_active, 0);
> +		nvme_mpath_clear_ctrl_paths(ctrl);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&nvme_subsystems_lock);

You probably want to take the lock over the iopolicy assignment to
serialize it.  And why do we need the atomic_set here?

> +
> +	pr_notice("%s: changed from %s to %s for subsysnqn %s\n", __func__,
> +			nvme_iopolicy_names[old_iopolicy], nvme_iopolicy_names[iopolicy],

Pleae avoid the overly long line here as well.

>  	NVME_REQ_CANCELLED		= (1 << 0),
>  	NVME_REQ_USERCMD		= (1 << 1),
>  	NVME_MPATH_IO_STATS		= (1 << 2),
> +	NVME_MPATH_CNT_ACTIVE	= (1 << 3),

This does not match the indentation above.