[PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.9.2-rc1

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
    block: add a partscan sysfs attribute for disks

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
    block: add a disk_has_partscan helper

SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
    Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: fix wrong schemes effective quota update command

SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
    Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage: fix wrong example of DAMOS filter matching sysfs file

Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
    docs: kernel_include.py: Cope with docutils 0.21

Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
    admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling: fix return type of PR_SCHED_CORE_GET

Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
    KEYS: trusted: Do not use WARN when encode fails

Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
    Revert "media: v4l2-ctrls: show all owned controls in log_status"

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
    remoteproc: mediatek: Make sure IPI buffer fits in L2TCM

Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
    serial: kgdboc: Fix NMI-safety problems from keyboard reset code

Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net>
    usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps6598x

Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net>
    usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps25750

Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
    usb: typec: ucsi: displayport: Fix potential deadlock

Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
    net: usb: ax88179_178a: fix link status when link is set to down/up

Prashanth K <quic_prashk@quicinc.com>
    usb: dwc3: Wait unconditionally after issuing EndXfer command

Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
    binder: fix max_thread type inconsistency

Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
    ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw: use generic rtd_init function for Realtek SDW DMICs

Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
    KEYS: trusted: Fix memory leak in tpm2_key_encode()

Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
    Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix div-by-zero in l2cap_le_flowctl_init()

Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
    x86/percpu: Use __force to cast from __percpu address space

Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com>
    net: ks8851: Fix another TX stall caused by wrong ISR flag handling

Jose Fernandez <josef@netflix.com>
    drm/amd/display: Fix division by zero in setup_dsc_config

Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
    cpufreq: amd-pstate: fix the highest frequency issue which limits performance

Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
    wifi: iwlwifi: Use request_module_nowait

Peter Tsao <peter.tsao@mediatek.com>
    Bluetooth: btusb: Fix the patch for MT7920 the affected to MT7921


-------------

Diffstat:

 Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block               | 10 +++
 .../admin-guide/hw-vuln/core-scheduling.rst        |  4 +-
 Documentation/admin-guide/mm/damon/usage.rst       |  6 +-
 Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py             |  1 -
 Makefile                                           |  4 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h                      |  6 +-
 block/genhd.c                                      | 15 +++--
 block/partitions/core.c                            |  5 +-
 drivers/android/binder.c                           |  2 +-
 drivers/android/binder_internal.h                  |  2 +-
 drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c                          |  1 +
 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c                       | 22 ++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dsc/dc_dsc.c        |  7 +-
 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls-core.c          | 18 ++----
 drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851_common.c        | 18 +-----
 drivers/net/usb/ax88179_178a.c                     | 37 +++++++----
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c       | 10 +--
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c                       | 10 ++-
 drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c                        | 30 ++++++++-
 drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c                          |  4 +-
 drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c                      | 51 ++++++++++-----
 drivers/usb/typec/tipd/tps6598x.h                  | 11 ++++
 drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/displayport.c               |  4 --
 include/linux/blkdev.h                             | 13 ++++
 include/net/bluetooth/hci.h                        |  9 +++
 include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h                   |  1 +
 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c                           | 75 +++++++++++++++-------
 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c                          | 31 +++++----
 net/bluetooth/iso.c                                |  2 +-
 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c                         | 17 +----
 net/bluetooth/sco.c                                |  6 +-
 security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c          | 25 ++++++--
 sound/soc/intel/boards/Makefile                    |  1 +
 sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c                   | 12 ++--
 sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw_common.h            |  1 +
 sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw_rt_dmic.c           | 52 +++++++++++++++
 36 files changed, 357 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 343 bytes --]

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[SeongJae Park]

Hello,

On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:45 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below.  Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].

Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 6a8a28e45f4b ("Linux 6.9.2-rc1")

Thanks,
SJ

[...]

---

ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_schemes_tried_regions_hang.py
ok 13 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_schemes_tried_regions_wss_estimation.py
ok 14 selftests: damon: damos_quota.py
ok 15 selftests: damon: damos_apply_interval.py
ok 16 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
ok 17 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
 [33m
 [92mPASS [39m

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Ronald Warsow]

Hi Greg

*no* regressions here on x86_64 (RKL, Intel 11th Gen. CPU)

Thanks

Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 5/23/24 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 5/23/24 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 556 bytes --]

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully compiled and installed the kernel on my computer (Acer
Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 5/23/24 6:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Anders Roxell]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 15:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 126 total, 126 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 29 total, 29 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 17 total, 17 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 5/23/24 07:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Jon Hunter]

On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:45 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.9:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    116 tests:	116 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	6.9.2-rc1-g6a8a28e45f4b
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Pavel Machek]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 922 bytes --]

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

We are now testing 6.9 too, and it seems okay

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.9.y

We are seeing some problems with spectre-meltdown checker,

https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/1138103#L998

while it passes on v6.8.11-rc1:

https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/1137807#L976

I'm not sure if that signifies real problem.

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>

Best regards,
                                                                Pavel

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,        Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Pascal Ernster]

[2024-05-23 15:12] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


Hi, 6.8.7-rc1 is running fine on various x86_64 bare metal and virtual 
machines of mine (Haswell, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake).

Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@hardfalcon.net>


Regards
Pascal

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Pascal Ernster]

[2024-05-23 15:12] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


Hi, 6.9.2-rc1 is running fine on various x86_64 bare metal and virtual 
machines of mine (Haswell, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake).

Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@hardfalcon.net>


Regards
Pascal

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Pascal Ernster]

[2024-05-23 15:12] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


Hi, 6.9.2-rc1 is running fine on various x86_64 bare metal and virtual 
machines of mine (Haswell, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake).

Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@hardfalcon.net>


Regards
Pascal

Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review

[Allen]

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.

Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>

Thanks.