* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-05-23 16:22 ` Mark Brown
2024-05-23 17:05 ` SeongJae Park
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-05-23 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 343 bytes --]
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 16:22 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-05-23 17:05 ` SeongJae Park
2024-05-23 21:06 ` Florian Fainelli
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-05-23 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, damon
Hello,
On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:45 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 6a8a28e45f4b ("Linux 6.9.2-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_schemes_tried_regions_hang.py
ok 13 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_schemes_tried_regions_wss_estimation.py
ok 14 selftests: damon: damos_quota.py
ok 15 selftests: damon: damos_apply_interval.py
ok 16 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
ok 17 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-05-23 16:22 ` Mark Brown
2024-05-23 17:05 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-05-23 21:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-23 21:18 ` Florian Fainelli
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-05-23 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 5/23/24 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-23 21:06 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-05-23 21:18 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-05-24 4:47 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-05-23 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 5/23/24 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-23 21:18 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-05-24 4:47 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-05-24 8:52 ` Ron Economos
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2024-05-24 4:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 556 bytes --]
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully compiled and installed the kernel on my computer (Acer
Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-24 4:47 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2024-05-24 8:52 ` Ron Economos
2024-05-24 9:32 ` Anders Roxell
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-05-24 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 5/23/24 6:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-24 8:52 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-05-24 9:32 ` Anders Roxell
2024-05-24 14:34 ` Shuah Khan
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Anders Roxell @ 2024-05-24 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 15:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 126 total, 126 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 29 total, 29 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 17 total, 17 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-24 9:32 ` Anders Roxell
@ 2024-05-24 14:34 ` Shuah Khan
2024-05-24 15:20 ` Jon Hunter
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-05-24 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 5/23/24 07:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-24 14:34 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-05-24 15:20 ` Jon Hunter
2024-05-24 18:47 ` Pavel Machek
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-05-24 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:45 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.9:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.9.2-rc1-g6a8a28e45f4b
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-24 15:20 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-05-24 18:47 ` Pavel Machek
2024-05-25 9:35 ` Pascal Ernster
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-05-24 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 922 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
We are now testing 6.9 too, and it seems okay
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.9.y
We are seeing some problems with spectre-meltdown checker,
https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/1138103#L998
while it passes on v6.8.11-rc1:
https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/1137807#L976
I'm not sure if that signifies real problem.
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-24 18:47 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-05-25 9:35 ` Pascal Ernster
2024-05-25 9:35 ` Pascal Ernster
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Pascal Ernster @ 2024-05-25 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[2024-05-23 15:12] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, 6.8.7-rc1 is running fine on various x86_64 bare metal and virtual
machines of mine (Haswell, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake).
Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@hardfalcon.net>
Regards
Pascal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-25 9:35 ` Pascal Ernster
@ 2024-05-25 9:35 ` Pascal Ernster
2024-05-25 9:37 ` Pascal Ernster
2024-05-25 16:26 ` Allen
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Pascal Ernster @ 2024-05-25 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[2024-05-23 15:12] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, 6.9.2-rc1 is running fine on various x86_64 bare metal and virtual
machines of mine (Haswell, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake).
Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@hardfalcon.net>
Regards
Pascal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-25 9:35 ` Pascal Ernster
@ 2024-05-25 9:37 ` Pascal Ernster
2024-05-25 16:26 ` Allen
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Pascal Ernster @ 2024-05-25 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[2024-05-23 15:12] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi, 6.9.2-rc1 is running fine on various x86_64 bare metal and virtual
machines of mine (Haswell, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake).
Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@hardfalcon.net>
Regards
Pascal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review
2024-05-23 13:12 [PATCH 6.9 00/25] 6.9.2-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2024-05-25 9:37 ` Pascal Ernster
@ 2024-05-25 16:26 ` Allen
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Allen @ 2024-05-25 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, broonie
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.2 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread