From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D84CD149E08; Thu, 23 May 2024 12:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716466396; cv=none; b=SIib0OWi2eBukFHvGpOJjhXM69MFIfOF0OLTeMc8SfoTinW8AE2O2ee4JCIvJ7SQDXy0FyerRDLbjYI7pet+S9nGRRAFnvX4FELWqDnEm1mSi85mtLxJL99JUXb9nwbqO/kwflGzZ3Jl2c+ftXjBBCyyMmptBsKw9fY9OIwe0eI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716466396; c=relaxed/simple; bh=133f/ppm7e5WBFptxyFQbVG8EMvUy33o+cg2kVvmScs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=q45WOyzfEXYSlw+YG3d1bMsNEWRFSetw5HgAWuCgMS38yyAHUV5wSLSKNTbTrAks84N7VXRd0NrlZRRTo/lDGf9u1xX10TXCc5Sbigh14nW+6wJrRlhKLRBtcIxWNb6pHh526b4ujDGxCahv8oMQqc4d1/OosR66U15F841Ftu0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=LsRnHD7U; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="LsRnHD7U" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1716466392; bh=133f/ppm7e5WBFptxyFQbVG8EMvUy33o+cg2kVvmScs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LsRnHD7Uog2ITakq18wy7ygWug9EUT5qq3HeLJPOLkNCEWXIWvV3jEGvKsSXitW+L +Q0s/o0GlcJv03qWXltfU4ZIym4/y+4S6bo/4euqa865crfewK2SsJTDcIg7cnnHtw 2pqgNAqpF3qEH0uZ00g9b0ouzJcI+qPVx613LpkpINUCHcAjq2h51ZXh9ZbPIWKGhD aTK9hMQYrG0cJKzQopG+cFrea36aO3ueov7NiMz3A2uRovuGwfbVuNCcWbvu0fqsnk utNHZm4Aio+FkPH03/08V8ZwbzBhDvAmIbOvJ8M5hGHwQQDLPMowTlweFEkRqhLxrT c1Evhc1QMnppQ== Received: from localhost (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5B303782039; Thu, 23 May 2024 12:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 14:13:10 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: =?UTF-8?B?QWRyacOhbg==?= Larumbe Cc: Rob Herring , Steven Price , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?UTF-8?B?S8O2bmln?= , Dmitry Osipenko , Zack Rusin , kernel@collabora.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] drm/panfrost: Fix dma_resv deadlock at drm object pin time Message-ID: <20240523141310.0b12c83c@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: <20240523113236.432585-2-adrian.larumbe@collabora.com> References: <20240523113236.432585-1-adrian.larumbe@collabora.com> <20240523113236.432585-2-adrian.larumbe@collabora.com> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 23 May 2024 12:32:17 +0100 Adri=C3=A1n Larumbe wrote: > When Panfrost must pin an object that is being prepared a dma-buf > attachment for on behalf of another driver, the core drm gem object pinni= ng > code already takes a lock on the object's dma reservation. >=20 > However, Panfrost GEM object's pinning callback would eventually try taki= ng > the lock on the same dma reservation when delegating pinning of the object > onto the shmem subsystem, which led to a deadlock. >=20 > This can be shown by enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH, which throws > the following recursive locking situation: >=20 > weston/3440 is trying to acquire lock: > ffff000000e235a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_gem_sh= mem_pin+0x34/0xb8 [drm_shmem_helper] > but task is already holding lock: > ffff000000e235a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_gem_pi= n+0x2c/0x80 [drm] >=20 > Fix it by replacing drm_gem_shmem_pin with its locked version, as the lock > had already been taken by drm_gem_pin(). >=20 > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann > Cc: Dmitry Osipenko > Cc: Boris Brezillon > Cc: Steven Price > Fixes: a78027847226 ("drm/gem: Acquire reservation lock in drm_gem_{pin/u= npin}()") > Signed-off-by: Adri=C3=A1n Larumbe Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/pa= nfrost/panfrost_gem.c > index d47b40b82b0b..8e0ff3efede7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int panfrost_gem_pin(struct drm_gem_object *ob= j) > if (bo->is_heap) > return -EINVAL; > =20 > - return drm_gem_shmem_pin(&bo->base); > + return drm_gem_shmem_pin_locked(&bo->base); > } > =20 > static enum drm_gem_object_status panfrost_gem_status(struct drm_gem_obj= ect *obj)