From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E9D584D3B; Thu, 23 May 2024 20:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716496440; cv=none; b=G0GzDjYMVOdIszpe/fOqVbk2KQJIB8BnXuZM0zyBHV9riPgSrO5ur2S5a1rhNIVBHfawCJ5ZZFOSOXli6/jiUjSamuR2ApIevumr5BkJm0tKK0ZddpdBDZts48mQd2ZRcmGlpWVguqDWYzFuBR20dbaOne00UF20WfmVkeSL09E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716496440; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+4B+O3Aw4Sfg8AK5WRHfCt9FlwQ2zU3xpqnsewfYaD8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MnKonR3E2OTBYkFrKh0drLl1pkbVTCU3EKKc6ieaIDwWuuX4TnT5OHAvtnc3uJTz9L5D0ET/Oc7k4ELcWFZL7zrZZTKgkLTyVOkBqUxmbDXpK0MGeP2rXK8y05Lq36NKFMeIm3cxqpNGo/YNtRMabW4uVNh9YJJMc0o8MPjdysg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=v5SIrry9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="v5SIrry9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=izeBpVR9zkGYZYzcEzW+5qmgjUEU7HHob31bUa9JVsE=; b=v5SIrry9+IaF99OePM7YUdRyno cVsnEhHNr06WRsn3NW3lZXPn3htbxeR9HAUu6+CDRP+jAmogdmV5o1iUD5U/Th9lL7Oliw+sE2dfI x6nkflNw4E8ORRP3CMNmMdgBsn79rBkZD0FJ438NyPEhhtMQImA8vBHAqGnjWeMtKkJlEAd1R7tQi ek+ntVHCA9RYzp8MdYd07xm0rgABte/5PVRL9cBFude4gJiAmHofpkSCogAkWv7UXym/J1wPgbM5Y Aj+L4JCdSWpJ6X+BYhnUwdp4xiHAfp+89RISTbqoPXXfjBIKLr6yJXw3Hc7fUH8DzfFwFmwuz+0ga Uvu5+nEQ==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sAF88-003rgV-03; Thu, 23 May 2024 20:33:40 +0000 Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 21:33:39 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Markus Elfring Cc: Conor Dooley , linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Eddie James , LKML , Andi Shyti , Andrew Jeffery , Conor Dooley , Joel Stanley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Lakshmi Yadlapati , Mark Brown , Ninad Palsule , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [v6 17/20] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add IBM Huygens BMC system Message-ID: <20240523203339.GS2118490@ZenIV> References: <20240522192524.3286237-18-eajames@linux.ibm.com> <2fe45df6-01a2-488b-99fb-5ee20491554c@web.de> <910b18b7-3717-4087-b028-fcaf5f2a604b@linux.ibm.com> <398bf753-6701-4925-b814-781a68a75cc5@web.de> <20240523-rinse-sturdily-7c78d8517884@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:46:48PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Would you like to mention in the changelog that a hardware description > >> should be extended anyhow? > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94 > > > > You are talking absolute crap here. Stop harassing contributors with > > your inane comments. > > Why do you interpret my patch review contributions in this direction > when the official Linux development documentation provides special advice > on affected wording details? Your "contributions" are garbage in general, and this thread is not an exception. More specifically, you are picking an advice that is inapplicable, transforming it into a question and "contributing" the result. And your entire modus operandi fits that pattern - you spew random garbage and expect the contributors to spend their time and efforts on checking if your (contents-free) "advice" happens to make any sense. That. Is. Worthless. According to people who'd met you in person you *are* a member of our species, and I can't exclude the possibility that in some other environments you might be capable of sentience. Unfortunately, the kernel development is clearly not among those.