Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: light: add VEML6040 RGBW-LS bindings

Arthur Becker
2024-06-03T08:24:03Z

From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Sent: 02 June 2024 15:16
To: Arthur Becker
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski; Lars-Peter Clausen; Rob Herring; Krzysztof Kozlowski; Conor Dooley; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-iio@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: light: add VEML6040 RGBW-LS bindings

> On Tue, 28 May 2024 07:23:03 +0000
> Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@sentec.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the Review!
> > Right, I wasn't sure if and how to add the veml6040 to the veml6075 dt-binding file.
> > I'll modify that the next time I make adjustments to the driver.
>
> Hi Arthur,
>
> If I read the above correctly you are hoping this merges as it stands and
> we come back later. If we are going to combine them long term,
> I'd rather we avoided the churn and had a combined DT binding from the start.

Hi Jonathan,

I could have phrased that better, what I meant was that I was waiting for the next
feedback on the driver to make the adjustments all at once.
I'll get to it shortly!

Kind Regards,
Arthur

>
> Jonathan
>
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Arthur
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> > Sent: 27 May 2024 18:31
> > To: Arthur Becker; Jonathan Cameron; Lars-Peter Clausen; Rob Herring; Krzysztof Kozlowski; Conor Dooley
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-iio@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: light: add VEML6040 RGBW-LS bindings
> >
> > On 27/05/2024 17:12, Arthur Becker via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > From: Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@sentec.com>
> > >
> > > Device tree bindings for the vishay VEML6040 RGBW light sensor iio
> > > driver
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@sentec.com>
> > > ---
> > > V1 -> V3: Addressed review comments (v1 of the dt-bindings was sent
> > > along with v2 of the driver but not in a set)
> >
> > It's basically the same as veml6075, so should be put there...
> >
> > Eh,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >