Re: [PATCH 06/20] drm/msm: Use iommu_paging_domain_alloc()

Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-31T08:30:07Z

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 09:57:54AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 5/30/24 3:58 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 May 2024 at 04:59, Baolu Lu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On 5/29/24 4:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 01:32:36PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > > > The domain allocated in msm_iommu_new() is for the @dev. Replace
> > > > > iommu_domain_alloc() with iommu_paging_domain_alloc() to make it explicit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Update msm_iommu_new() to always return ERR_PTR in failure cases instead
> > > > > of NULL.
> > > > Please don't mix unrelated changes, because ...
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c | 8 ++++----
> > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c
> > > > > index d5512037c38b..f7e28d4b5f62 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c
> > > > > @@ -407,9 +407,9 @@ struct msm_mmu *msm_iommu_new(struct device *dev, unsigned long quirks)
> > > > > struct msm_iommu *iommu;
> > > > > int ret;
> > > > >
> > > > > - domain = iommu_domain_alloc(dev->bus);
> > > > > - if (!domain)
> > > > > - return NULL;
> > > > > + domain = iommu_paging_domain_alloc(dev);
> > > > > + if (IS_ERR(domain))
> > > > > + return ERR_CAST(domain);
> > > > >
> > > > > iommu_set_pgtable_quirks(domain, quirks);
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ struct msm_mmu *msm_iommu_gpu_new(struct device *dev, struct msm_gpu *gpu, unsig
> > > > > struct msm_mmu *mmu;
> > > > >
> > > > > mmu = msm_iommu_new(dev, quirks);
> > > > > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mmu))
> > > > > + if (IS_ERR(mmu))
> > > > > return mmu;
> > > > NAK, not having an IOMMU is a poor but legit usecase for some of devices
> > > > which don't have IOMMU support yet (for example because of the buggy
> > > > implementation for which we were not able to get all the hooks in).
> > > >
> > > > Please don't break compatibility for existing platforms.
> > > Sure. I will remove this line of change. Though I have no idea in which
> > > case msm_iommu_new() could return NULL after this patch.
> > So, even without this chunk you are going to break the no-IOMMU case.
> > Please don't. This will result in a regression report and a revert.
> >
> > Instead please provide a way for the existing drivers to continue
> > working. For example, something like:
> >
> > if (IS_ERR(mmu) && ERR_PTR(mmu) == -ENODEV))
> > return NULL;
>
> Oh I see. msm_iommu_new() returning NULL indicates a no-IOMMU case,
> right? So perhaps we can make it explicit like below?
>
> if (!device_iommu_mapped(dev))
> return NULL;
>
> domain = iommu_paging_domain_alloc(dev);
> if (IS_ERR(domain))
> return ERR_CAST(domain);

Yes, this should work, thank you.

--
With best wishes
Dmitry