public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] rcu/nocb: Remove SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 15:45:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240530134552.5467-10-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240530134552.5467-1-frederic@kernel.org>

RCU core can't be running anymore while in the middle of (de-)offloading
since this sort of transition now only applies to offline CPUs.

The SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE state can therefore be removed.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h | 9 ++++-----
 kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h    | 9 ---------
 kernel/rcu/tree.c             | 3 ---
 kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h        | 9 ---------
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h b/include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h
index ba95c06675e1..5469c54cd778 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h
@@ -185,11 +185,10 @@ struct rcu_cblist {
  *  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  */
 #define SEGCBLIST_ENABLED	BIT(0)
-#define SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE	BIT(1)
-#define SEGCBLIST_LOCKING	BIT(2)
-#define SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_CB	BIT(3)
-#define SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_GP	BIT(4)
-#define SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED	BIT(5)
+#define SEGCBLIST_LOCKING	BIT(1)
+#define SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_CB	BIT(2)
+#define SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_GP	BIT(3)
+#define SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED	BIT(4)
 
 struct rcu_segcblist {
 	struct rcu_head *head;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
index 4fe877f5f654..7a0962dfee86 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
@@ -95,15 +95,6 @@ static inline bool rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline bool rcu_segcblist_completely_offloaded(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
-{
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU) &&
-	    !rcu_segcblist_test_flags(rsclp, SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE))
-		return true;
-
-	return false;
-}
-
 /*
  * Are all segments following the specified segment of the specified
  * rcu_segcblist structure empty of callbacks?  (The specified
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 4f1863a0536d..8bec3c0c9636 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -79,9 +79,6 @@ static void rcu_sr_normal_gp_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *);
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rcu_data, rcu_data) = {
 	.gpwrap = true,
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
-	.cblist.flags = SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE,
-#endif
 };
 static struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
 	.level = { &rcu_state.node[0] },
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index af44e75eb0cd..24daf606de0c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -1060,7 +1060,6 @@ static int rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass));
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist));
 
-	rcu_segcblist_set_flags(cblist, SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE);
 	wake_gp = rdp_offload_toggle(rdp, false, flags);
 
 	mutex_lock(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread_mutex);
@@ -1168,13 +1167,6 @@ static int rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	swait_event_exclusive(rdp->nocb_state_wq,
 			      rcu_segcblist_test_flags(cblist, SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_GP));
 
-	/*
-	 * All kthreads are ready to work, we can finally enable nocb bypass.
-	 */
-	rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
-	rcu_segcblist_clear_flags(cblist, SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE);
-	rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1350,7 +1342,6 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
 			rcu_segcblist_init(&rdp->cblist);
 		rcu_segcblist_offload(&rdp->cblist, true);
 		rcu_segcblist_set_flags(&rdp->cblist, SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_GP);
-		rcu_segcblist_clear_flags(&rdp->cblist, SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE);
 	}
 	rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads();
 }
-- 
2.45.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-30 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-30 13:45 [PATCH 00/11] rcu/nocb: (De-)offloading on offline CPUs Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] rcu/nocb: Introduce RCU_NOCB_LOCKDEP_WARN() Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] rcu/nocb: Move nocb field at the end of state struct Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] rcu/nocb: Assert no callbacks while nocb kthread allocation fails Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] rcu/nocb: Introduce nocb mutex Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] rcu/nocb: (De-)offload callbacks on offline CPUs only Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from bypass Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 07/11] rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from rcu_core()'s QS reporting Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 08/11] rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from rcu_core Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 10/11] rcu/nocb: Remove SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_CB Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 11/11] rcu/nocb: Simplify (de-)offloading state machine Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-02 23:19   ` Boqun Feng
2024-07-03 12:17     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-03 22:56   ` [PATCH 11/11 v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-03 23:52     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-19 17:30 ` [PATCH 00/11] rcu/nocb: (De-)offloading on offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240530134552.5467-10-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox