From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from rcu_core
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 15:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240530134552.5467-9-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240530134552.5467-1-frederic@kernel.org>
RCU core can't be running anymore while in the middle of (de-)offloading
since this sort of transition now only applies to offline CPUs.
The locked callback acceleration handling during the transition can
therefore be removed, along with concurrent batch execution.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 26 ++++----------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index c502a38dc5f3..4f1863a0536d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2776,24 +2776,6 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
- /*
- * On RT rcu_core() can be preempted when IRQs aren't disabled.
- * Therefore this function can race with concurrent NOCB (de-)offloading
- * on this CPU and the below condition must be considered volatile.
- * However if we race with:
- *
- * _ Offloading: In the worst case we accelerate or process callbacks
- * concurrently with NOCB kthreads. We are guaranteed to
- * call rcu_nocb_lock() if that happens.
- *
- * _ Deoffloading: In the worst case we miss callbacks acceleration or
- * processing. This is fine because the early stage
- * of deoffloading invokes rcu_core() after setting
- * SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE. So we guarantee that we'll process
- * what could have been dismissed without the need to wait
- * for the next rcu_pending() check in the next jiffy.
- */
- const bool do_batch = !rcu_segcblist_completely_offloaded(&rdp->cblist);
if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
return;
@@ -2813,17 +2795,17 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
/* No grace period and unregistered callbacks? */
if (!rcu_gp_in_progress() &&
- rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist) && do_batch) {
- rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
+ rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist) && !rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
+ local_irq_save(flags);
if (!rcu_segcblist_restempty(&rdp->cblist, RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL))
rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked(rnp, rdp);
- rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
rcu_check_gp_start_stall(rnp, rdp, rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check());
/* If there are callbacks ready, invoke them. */
- if (do_batch && rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist) &&
+ if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp) && rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist) &&
likely(READ_ONCE(rcu_scheduler_fully_active))) {
rcu_do_batch(rdp);
/* Re-invoke RCU core processing if there are callbacks remaining. */
--
2.45.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-30 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-30 13:45 [PATCH 00/11] rcu/nocb: (De-)offloading on offline CPUs Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] rcu/nocb: Introduce RCU_NOCB_LOCKDEP_WARN() Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] rcu/nocb: Move nocb field at the end of state struct Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] rcu/nocb: Assert no callbacks while nocb kthread allocation fails Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] rcu/nocb: Introduce nocb mutex Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] rcu/nocb: (De-)offload callbacks on offline CPUs only Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from bypass Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 07/11] rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from rcu_core()'s QS reporting Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 09/11] rcu/nocb: Remove SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 10/11] rcu/nocb: Remove SEGCBLIST_KTHREAD_CB Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 11/11] rcu/nocb: Simplify (de-)offloading state machine Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-02 23:19 ` Boqun Feng
2024-07-03 12:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-03 22:56 ` [PATCH 11/11 v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-03 23:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-19 17:30 ` [PATCH 00/11] rcu/nocb: (De-)offloading on offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240530134552.5467-9-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox