From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E73210197 for ; Thu, 30 May 2024 06:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717051037; cv=none; b=ZALeSxHSREeHPdas1nvCdRef681dNa0B/zJ11eEYxcntztoSy91gZEL9VvSz0wyElvos24HcOWC0DAd0Ak9eHAIpS2n9iI02hAhScwtVV5Ycy6AlvcJcgxG4cmyCj6noLn784AjjpF8sv1EnGlYYJetc9zX2F4bngGDBfL5F9vc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717051037; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xYfnI1YzjUptr5lHZs5yUaLN1qMaYn1bInEg9WPBe/k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mCduZFVs/v2uBDyVkU18HDeX86p0GtqK4yOa3Bd0wOza1MRDfdj++xkVEvFpcnj//8fAiSitI2genGE3dYImMZfa1fX8o4siMeWOxMF4P1B5PMChA8uba0QozrY3WCxC0AW2AlTUMvMcRQA0W09Y3/w6DBk2zQXMpU8Vy7TSlSM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jMbsC2+o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jMbsC2+o" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1717051036; x=1748587036; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xYfnI1YzjUptr5lHZs5yUaLN1qMaYn1bInEg9WPBe/k=; b=jMbsC2+oX/+Gqn4J/veVLPHMJp5QNu0GIn93XZVMmnW0DUhsb9Fcscy3 1Rz1r+Gi1qMxgLfESdodd2Bfkz5EcbYbaSJO69DBdw+ey4abOLk7IkvUJ QBPFsfcvsrhHnWmMiDN8ozeGsn6B2hzN1itMg6y2Yh0PXVGriUTmYkbYO npmShRuMFN75A+f2n4UIcvNGqKSkhDTUgzCeZM8rx4RPQqJ+YNPJv2W0v egMRHN1+lu1u865fZjNLHMyjKRK8iVt64WtIW42vuSgPwQixXkHp9DXAL 2oVdi0zIAH4OjWPNzdU66AAcq+Oy1nTJHe1stU2jEDabO7Si2XK4D/gXu w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +ynnq34/RLqsQ5ZLPRPBfg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: cndxItsJQyuCiU8+P7V1fg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11087"; a="13693262" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,199,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="13693262" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 May 2024 23:37:15 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rlqGgxDjQfSLc44CwICBnw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vO77sm1ESBeeSAGc6jOhHA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,199,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="36263693" Received: from unknown (HELO 0610945e7d16) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 May 2024 23:37:10 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 0610945e7d16 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sCZPP-000Eta-2k; Thu, 30 May 2024 06:37:07 +0000 Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 14:36:59 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Baolin Wang , akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, ying.huang@intel.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, shy828301@gmail.com, ziy@nvidia.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, da.gomez@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: shmem: add mTHP support for anonymous shmem Message-ID: <202405301430.0NRLTOWU-lkp@intel.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Baolin, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test WARNING on next-20240529] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.10-rc1] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Baolin-Wang/mm-memory-extend-finish_fault-to-support-large-folio/20240530-100805 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ec35a23026dd016705d211e85163cabe07681516.1717033868.git.baolin.wang%40linux.alibaba.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: shmem: add mTHP support for anonymous shmem config: riscv-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240530/202405301430.0NRLTOWU-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project bafda89a0944d947fc4b3b5663185e07a397ac30) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240530/202405301430.0NRLTOWU-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405301430.0NRLTOWU-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from mm/shmem.c:28: In file included from include/linux/ramfs.h:5: In file included from include/linux/fs_parser.h:11: In file included from include/linux/fs_context.h:14: In file included from include/linux/security.h:33: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2245: include/linux/vmstat.h:514:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 514 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ >> mm/shmem.c:1748:14: warning: variable 'suitable_orders' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized] 1748 | } else if (orders & BIT(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/shmem.c:1766:25: note: uninitialized use occurs here 1766 | order = highest_order(suitable_orders); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/shmem.c:1748:10: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true 1748 | } else if (orders & BIT(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/shmem.c:1736:31: note: initialize the variable 'suitable_orders' to silence this warning 1736 | unsigned long suitable_orders; | ^ | = 0 2 warnings generated. vim +1748 mm/shmem.c 1728 1729 static struct folio *shmem_alloc_and_add_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf, 1730 gfp_t gfp, struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, 1731 struct mm_struct *fault_mm, unsigned long orders) 1732 { 1733 struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping; 1734 struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode); 1735 struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf ? vmf->vma : NULL; 1736 unsigned long suitable_orders; 1737 struct folio *folio = NULL; 1738 long pages; 1739 int error, order; 1740 1741 if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) 1742 orders = 0; 1743 1744 if (orders > 0) { 1745 if (vma && vma_is_anon_shmem(vma)) { 1746 suitable_orders = anon_shmem_suitable_orders(inode, vmf, 1747 mapping, index, orders); > 1748 } else if (orders & BIT(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)) { 1749 pages = HPAGE_PMD_NR; 1750 suitable_orders = BIT(HPAGE_PMD_ORDER); 1751 index = round_down(index, HPAGE_PMD_NR); 1752 1753 /* 1754 * Check for conflict before waiting on a huge allocation. 1755 * Conflict might be that a huge page has just been allocated 1756 * and added to page cache by a racing thread, or that there 1757 * is already at least one small page in the huge extent. 1758 * Be careful to retry when appropriate, but not forever! 1759 * Elsewhere -EEXIST would be the right code, but not here. 1760 */ 1761 if (xa_find(&mapping->i_pages, &index, 1762 index + HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1, XA_PRESENT)) 1763 return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG); 1764 } 1765 1766 order = highest_order(suitable_orders); 1767 while (suitable_orders) { 1768 pages = 1UL << order; 1769 index = round_down(index, pages); 1770 folio = shmem_alloc_folio(gfp, order, info, index); 1771 if (folio) 1772 goto allocated; 1773 1774 if (pages == HPAGE_PMD_NR) 1775 count_vm_event(THP_FILE_FALLBACK); 1776 order = next_order(&suitable_orders, order); 1777 } 1778 } else { 1779 pages = 1; 1780 folio = shmem_alloc_folio(gfp, 0, info, index); 1781 } 1782 if (!folio) 1783 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); 1784 1785 allocated: 1786 __folio_set_locked(folio); 1787 __folio_set_swapbacked(folio); 1788 1789 gfp &= GFP_RECLAIM_MASK; 1790 error = mem_cgroup_charge(folio, fault_mm, gfp); 1791 if (error) { 1792 if (xa_find(&mapping->i_pages, &index, 1793 index + pages - 1, XA_PRESENT)) { 1794 error = -EEXIST; 1795 } else if (pages == HPAGE_PMD_NR) { 1796 count_vm_event(THP_FILE_FALLBACK); 1797 count_vm_event(THP_FILE_FALLBACK_CHARGE); 1798 } 1799 goto unlock; 1800 } 1801 1802 error = shmem_add_to_page_cache(folio, mapping, index, NULL, gfp); 1803 if (error) 1804 goto unlock; 1805 1806 error = shmem_inode_acct_blocks(inode, pages); 1807 if (error) { 1808 struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo = SHMEM_SB(inode->i_sb); 1809 long freed; 1810 /* 1811 * Try to reclaim some space by splitting a few 1812 * large folios beyond i_size on the filesystem. 1813 */ 1814 shmem_unused_huge_shrink(sbinfo, NULL, 2); 1815 /* 1816 * And do a shmem_recalc_inode() to account for freed pages: 1817 * except our folio is there in cache, so not quite balanced. 1818 */ 1819 spin_lock(&info->lock); 1820 freed = pages + info->alloced - info->swapped - 1821 READ_ONCE(mapping->nrpages); 1822 if (freed > 0) 1823 info->alloced -= freed; 1824 spin_unlock(&info->lock); 1825 if (freed > 0) 1826 shmem_inode_unacct_blocks(inode, freed); 1827 error = shmem_inode_acct_blocks(inode, pages); 1828 if (error) { 1829 filemap_remove_folio(folio); 1830 goto unlock; 1831 } 1832 } 1833 1834 shmem_recalc_inode(inode, pages, 0); 1835 folio_add_lru(folio); 1836 return folio; 1837 1838 unlock: 1839 folio_unlock(folio); 1840 folio_put(folio); 1841 return ERR_PTR(error); 1842 } 1843 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki