public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, johan@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mfd: lm3533: Hide legacy platform data in the driver
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 17:58:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240531165834.GA1204315@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zln9lRvKJYwlSM3l@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Fri, 31 May 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 04:54:45PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 May 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 04:00:48PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 08 May 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > First of all, there is no user for the platform data in the kernel.
> > > > > Second, it needs a lot of updates to follow the modern standards
> > > > > of the kernel, including proper Device Tree bindings and device
> > > > > property handling.
> > > > > 
> > > > > For now, just hide the legacy platform data in the driver's code.
> > > > 
> > > > Why not just rip it out entirely?
> > > 
> > > You mean the driver?
> > 
> > The unused platform data.
> 
> Good question. In any case these drivers are non-functional anyway without OOT
> board code. If we rip out the main platform data completely, the logical following
> question arises: why do we need the per-device platform data? If we rip that out,
> we basically make non-functional driver a 100% dead code. Hence what you propose
> mostly equals to ripping out the drivers completely.
> 
> TL;DR: with the main platform data being ripped out the driver code will be in
> inconsistent state.

What do you think Johan?  Do you see any reason to keep it around?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-31 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-08 10:46 [PATCH v1 0/2] mfd: lm3533: Get rid of legacy GPIO APIs Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-08 10:46 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mfd: lm3533: Hide legacy platform data in the driver Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-27 13:03   ` Linus Walleij
2024-05-31 15:00   ` Lee Jones
2024-05-31 15:08     ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-31 15:54       ` Lee Jones
2024-05-31 16:40         ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-31 16:58           ` Lee Jones [this message]
2024-05-31 17:09             ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-06-05 12:40             ` Johan Hovold
2024-05-08 10:46 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mfd: lm3533: Move to new GPIO descriptor-based APIs Andy Shevchenko
2024-05-27 13:05   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240531165834.GA1204315@google.com \
    --to=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox