From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: Conor Culhane <conor.culhane@silvaco.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:SILVACO I3C
DUAL-ROLE MASTER), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list),
imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i3c: master: svc: resend target address when get NACK
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 16:00:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240603160018.29498c2f@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240531163301.1401281-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Hi Frank,
Frank.Li@nxp.com wrote on Fri, 31 May 2024 12:33:00 -0400:
> According to I3C Spec 1.1.1, 11-Jun-2021, section: 5.1.2.2.3:
>
> If the Controller chooses to start an I3C Message with an I3C Dynamic
> Address, then special provisions shall be made because that same I3C Target
> may be initiating an IBI or a Controller Role Request. So, one of three
> things may happen: (skip 1, 2)
>
> 3. The Addresses match and the RnW bits also match, and so neither
> Controller nor Target will ACK since both are expecting the other side to
> provide ACK. As a result, each side might think it had "won" arbitration,
> but neither side would continue, as each would subsequently see that the
> other did not provide ACK.
> ...
> For either value of RnW: Due to the NACK, the Controller shall defer the
> Private Write or Private Read, and should typically transmit the Target
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Address again after a Repeated START (i.e., the next one or any one prior
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> to a STOP in the Frame). Since the Address Header following a Repeated
> START is not arbitrated, the Controller will always win (see Section
> 5.1.2.2.4).
>
> Resend target address again if address is not 7E and controller get NACK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
I'm not getting 100% of it, but looks okay, so:
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-03 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-31 16:33 [PATCH 1/1] i3c: master: svc: resend target address when get NACK Frank Li
2024-06-03 14:00 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240603160018.29498c2f@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=conor.culhane@silvaco.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox