From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, himanshujha199640@gmail.com,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 13/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in DMA safe region
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:27:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240603202730.7ce99cbf@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240602193310.GE387181@vamoiridPC>
On Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:33:10 +0200
Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 01:59:08PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 May 2024 20:38:01 +0200
> > Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Move the buffers that are used in order to read data from the
> > > device in a DMA-safe region. Also create defines for the number
> > > of bytes that are being read from the device and don't use
> > > magic numbers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
> >
> > Same response as previous. I don't think it's necessary because
> > of the custom regmap implementation.
> >
> > My first instinct was the same as yours though!
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> Well, even if we end up not needing it, I would keep the values inside
> the union just becasue it saves some space, and it keeps all the read
> buffers in the same place. What do you think?
>
Sure. The union is fine as long as you have made sure there can't be
concurrent access to the different members. It will save space on x86_64
at least as that has very low IIO_DMA_MINALIGN. Less likely to make
a difference on arm64.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-03 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-27 18:37 [PATCH v1 00/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Driver cleanup Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 01/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Fix pressure value output Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 02/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Fix calibration data variable Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 03/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Fix overflows in compensate() functions Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 04/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Fix sensor data read operation Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-02 12:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-02 19:00 ` Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-03 19:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-03 20:31 ` Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 05/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Fix type in define Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-02 12:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-02 19:17 ` Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 06/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Add mutexes to guard read/write to device Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 07/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data types Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 08/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 09/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 10/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-02 12:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-02 19:25 ` Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:37 ` [PATCH v1 11/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-02 12:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-02 19:30 ` Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-03 19:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-03 20:30 ` Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-06 19:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-27 18:38 ` [PATCH v1 12/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:38 ` [PATCH v1 13/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in DMA safe region Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-02 12:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-02 19:33 ` Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-03 19:27 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-05-27 18:38 ` [PATCH v1 14/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-02 13:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-02 19:40 ` Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:38 ` [PATCH v1 15/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:38 ` [PATCH v1 16/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw() Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-05-27 18:38 ` [PATCH v1 17/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-02 13:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-06-02 19:53 ` Vasileios Amoiridis
2024-06-02 12:31 ` [PATCH v1 00/17] iio: chemical: bme680: Driver cleanup Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240603202730.7ce99cbf@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=himanshujha199640@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vassilisamir@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox