From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rc] workqueue: Reimplement UAF fix to avoid lockdep worning
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:38:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240604113834.GO3884@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240604105456.1668-1-hdanton@sina.com>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:54:56PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 11:09:58 +0300 Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 10:10:36AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > >
> > > And KASAN is reporting use-after-free on a completely unrelated VFS object.
> > > I can't tell for sure from the logs alone but lockdep_register_key()
> > > iterates entries in the hashtable trying to find whether the key is a
> > > duplicate and it could be that that walk is triggering the use-after-free
> > > warning. If so, it doesn't really have much to do with workqueue. The
> > > corruption happened elsewhere and workqueue just happens to traverse the
> > > hashtable afterwards.
> >
> > The problem is that revert of commit 643445531829
> > ("workqueue: Fix UAF report by KASAN in pwq_release_workfn()")
> > fixed these use-after-free reports.
> >
> Given revert makes sense,
Thanks, it is very rare situation where call to flush/drain queue
(in our case kthread_flush_worker) in the middle of the allocation
flow can be correct. I can't remember any such case.
So even we don't fully understand the root cause, the reimplementation
is still valid and improves existing code.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-04 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-28 8:39 [PATCH -rc] workqueue: Reimplement UAF fix to avoid lockdep worning Leon Romanovsky
2024-05-30 21:42 ` Tejun Heo
2024-05-31 3:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-05-31 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-02 6:56 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-03 20:10 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-04 8:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-04 10:54 ` Hillf Danton
2024-06-04 11:38 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2024-06-04 16:30 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-04 18:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-04 20:04 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-05 11:10 ` Hillf Danton
2024-06-06 7:38 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-06 10:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-07 11:04 ` Hillf Danton
2024-06-04 11:40 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-04 13:16 ` Tariq Toukan
2024-06-04 14:21 ` Imre Deak
2024-06-04 14:30 ` Imre Deak
2024-06-04 15:20 ` Dan Williams
2024-06-04 15:45 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240604113834.GO3884@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox