From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rc] workqueue: Reimplement UAF fix to avoid lockdep worning
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 21:58:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240604185804.GT3884@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zl9BOaPDsQBc8hSL@slm.duckdns.org>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:30:49AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Leon.
>
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 02:38:34PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > Thanks, it is very rare situation where call to flush/drain queue
> > (in our case kthread_flush_worker) in the middle of the allocation
> > flow can be correct. I can't remember any such case.
> >
> > So even we don't fully understand the root cause, the reimplementation
> > is still valid and improves existing code.
>
> It's not valid. pwq release is async and while wq free in the error path
> isn't. The flush is there so that we finish the async part before
> synchronize error handling. The patch you posted will can lead to double
> free after a pwq allocation failure. We can make the error path synchronous
> but the pwq free path should be updated first so that it stays synchronous
> in the error path. Note that it *needs* to be asynchronous in non-error
> paths, so it's going to be a bit subtle one way or the other.
But at that point, we didn't add newly created WQ to any list which will execute
that asynchronous release. Did I miss something?
Anyway, I understand that the lockdep_register_key() corruption comes
from something else. Do you have any idea what can cause it? How can we
help debug this issue?
Thanks
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-04 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-28 8:39 [PATCH -rc] workqueue: Reimplement UAF fix to avoid lockdep worning Leon Romanovsky
2024-05-30 21:42 ` Tejun Heo
2024-05-31 3:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-05-31 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-02 6:56 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-03 20:10 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-04 8:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-04 10:54 ` Hillf Danton
2024-06-04 11:38 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-04 16:30 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-04 18:58 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2024-06-04 20:04 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-05 11:10 ` Hillf Danton
2024-06-06 7:38 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-06 10:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-07 11:04 ` Hillf Danton
2024-06-04 11:40 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-06-04 13:16 ` Tariq Toukan
2024-06-04 14:21 ` Imre Deak
2024-06-04 14:30 ` Imre Deak
2024-06-04 15:20 ` Dan Williams
2024-06-04 15:45 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240604185804.GT3884@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox