From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D7641946CB for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717580566; cv=none; b=CikN/IlsrhXKscdoVyoH0+EMsV7DrCWXte7RFKTKhjPzZGwfNIOTB5xAG6yRVX/pAHuiV8P1jPsjpzaa7XJx/P8BQkWSZo1LitDqjpcbPuL+XXksWbdjVINye1bD9KeD8miQaC0BA7bPHEoQlISV49CCMQDVK7xSjv0Em3sg1Ks= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717580566; c=relaxed/simple; bh=reWmc9PmoXH+7zE7T6+aX+Zbm95Zvw2YL7N2SCV20nw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dAYL8L+0AHE3gAY7oohbw5owtnO0TGPFlHDuhq3CidP4RCdLa4Qiq19S3FU/gPNribI/SrUpPn2dStParmTMHZvmbblE6CBEg224SmmK34lpBvHSqpoSArviVFZxYn9N7BqVjPqtFl5Qy/olEF3GL189vvxBUFaCaHyQ014UXuA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=heq3kTCg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="heq3kTCg" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=reWmc9PmoXH+7zE7T6+aX+Zbm95Zvw2YL7N2SCV20nw=; b=heq3kTCgOEIFTmPsaBFIeEarXI 0VAejkD0gKynNnV5qvc6DzFyql0mIZs6OuMjmgYg9K9XT0CzSsGBqKnGzqzhqTLzGRcRkJA4cCuv9 xQUxnppoBWTKaAgJB50nFa/GW4dgK2DNaKx9crALaohEl8ZL/Jqih99yidcHoE+qYaFDmmDrsYwIK izajTImOHUcVZfO5mh2J9qCUJXRHzxBfqcU+PHbn6gsefDVFubLkzVMAd4JQoIWMAocwXoIO863GN /cU87TTHzHlnSGkRnhSCSTv9Mrw6xe9MzVz35Ah5KaKNyqieFkjKVPwYKJ+x497zk10GTLnw3gjv4 aYEze/Ig==; Received: from j130084.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.130.84] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sEnA7-0000000FlsF-3gWb; Wed, 05 Jun 2024 09:42:32 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3D33C30068B; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:42:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:42:31 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Luis Machado Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kprateek.nayak@amd.com, wuyun.abel@bytedance.com, tglx@linutronix.de, efault@gmx.de, John Stultz , Hongyan.Xia2@arm.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 08/10] sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue Message-ID: <20240605094231.GR26599@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20240426093241.GI12673@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <2fba04b0-e55e-41f4-8b7a-723734fe1ad2@arm.com> <20240529225036.GN40213@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <7eac0774-0f9d-487c-97b6-ab0e85f0ae3a@arm.com> <20240604101107.GO26599@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <24e09046-74ee-4ebb-ac1a-bdc84568e825@arm.com> <20240604191220.GP40213@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20240605072225.GR12673@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <7b26df23-4977-4fad-8721-137a23932b6e@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7b26df23-4977-4fad-8721-137a23932b6e@arm.com> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 10:14:47AM +0100, Luis Machado wrote: > ... thanks for the patch! The above seems to do it for me. I can see > more reasonable energy use with the eevdf-complete series. Still a > bit higher. Might be noise, we'll see. W00t!!! Let me write a decent Changelog and stuff it in the git tree along with all the other bits. Thanks for all the testing.